首页|常规超声改良IOTA简单法与超声造影对卵巢肿瘤的定性诊断价值比较

常规超声改良IOTA简单法与超声造影对卵巢肿瘤的定性诊断价值比较

扫码查看
目的 比较卵巢肿瘤定性诊断中应用常规超声改良国际卵巢癌分析组织(IOTA)简单法与超声造影的效果.方法 回顾性分析行常规检查发现疑似恶性卵巢肿瘤70例患者的资料,所有患者均接受常规超声改良IOTA简单法诊断、超声造影检查,以病理学诊断为标准,判断两者及联合检查对卵巢肿瘤的定性诊断价值,比较良恶性卵巢肿瘤患者常规超声及超声造影特征.结果 70例可疑患者病理学诊断结果:27例恶性(38.57%),43例良性(61.43%);改良IOTA简单法诊断结果:良性41例,恶性22例,不确定7例,卵巢肿瘤定性诊断敏感度、特异度、准确率分别为62.96%、83.72%、75.71%;恶性卵巢肿瘤患者超声特征与良性患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);超声造影诊断结果:良性37例,恶性33例,卵巢肿瘤定性诊断敏感度、特异度、准确率分别为88.89%、79.07%、82.56%;恶性卵巢肿瘤患者超声造影影像特征及定量参数与良性患者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合检查诊断良性44例,恶性26例,卵巢肿瘤定性诊断敏感度、特异度、准确率分别为77.78%、88.37%、84.29%.结论 卵巢肿瘤定性诊断中应用常规超声改良IO-TA 简单法和超声造影效果均较好,两者各有优劣,联合检查有助于降低单一检查造成的误诊、漏诊,提高诊断效能.
Comparison of Qualitative Diagnostic Value of Conventional Ultrasound Modified IOTA Simple Rule and Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound on Ovarian Tumors
Objective To compare the effects of conventional ultrasound modified International Ovarian Tumor Analysis(IOTA)simple rule and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the qualitative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.Methods Retrospective a-nalysis was conducted on the data of 70 patients with suspected malignant ovarian tumors who underwent routine examination.All patients received conventional ultrasound modified IOTA simple rule diagnosis and contrast-enhanced ultrasound.With pathologi-cal diagnosis as the standard,the qualitative diagnostic value of the two and combined examination on ovarian tumors was judged,and the characteristics of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors were compared.Results The pathological diagnosis of 70 suspected patients included 27 malignant cases(38.57%)and 43 benign cases(61.43%).Modified IOTA simple rule diagnosed 41 benign cases,22 malignant cases and 7 uncertain cases,and the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy rate of qualitative diagnosis of ovarian tumor were 62.96%,83.72%and 75.71%respec-tively.There were statistical differences in ultrasound characteristics between patients with malignant ovarian tumors and patients with benign ovarian tumors(P<0.05).37 cases were benign and 33 cases were malignant by contrast-enhanced ultrasound,and the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy rate of qualitative diagnosis of ovarian tumors were 88.89%,79.07%and 82.56%.The contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging characteristics and quantitative parameters revealed statistical differences between patients with malignant ovarian tumors and benign patients(P<0.05).Combined examination diagnosed 44 benign cases and 26 malig-nant cases,and the sensitivity,specificity and accuracy rate were 77.78%,88.37%and 84.29%,respectively.Conclusion Both conventional ultrasound modified IOTA simple rule and contrast-enhanced ultrasound have good effects in the qualitative di-agnosis of ovarian tumors,and each method has its own advantages and disadvantages.Combined examination is helpful to reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis caused by single examination and enhance the diagnostic efficiency.

Ovarian tumorsQualitative diagnosisContrast-enhanced ultrasoundModified International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rule

王璐、郭煜、周海霞

展开 >

450000 郑州大学第一附属医院

卵巢肿瘤 定性诊断 超声造影 改良国际卵巢癌分析组织简单法

2024

实用癌症杂志
江西省肿瘤医院 江西省肿瘤研究所

实用癌症杂志

影响因子:1.241
ISSN:1001-5930
年,卷(期):2024.39(6)