首页|DSA灌注成像技术在晚期肝癌患者DEB-TACE术后短期效果评估中的应用价值

DSA灌注成像技术在晚期肝癌患者DEB-TACE术后短期效果评估中的应用价值

扫码查看
目的 探究数字减影血管造影(DSA)灌注成像技术在晚期肝癌患者药物洗脱微球-经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)术后短期效果评估中的应用价值.方法 选取164例行DEB-TACE术的晚期肝癌患者作为研究对象,根据患者术后短期疗效分成OR组(完全缓解+部分缓解),非OR组(疾病稳定+疾病进展).患者在术后均行DSA灌注成像技术检测;受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析DSA灌注成像技术对DEB-TACE术后短期效果的诊断价值.结果 164例患者经DEB-TACE术治疗,完全缓解49例,部分缓解55例,疾病稳定53例,疾病进展7例.非OR组患者到达时间显著低于OR组(P<0.05),达峰时间、充盈率、曲线宽度和平均通过时间显著高于OR组(P<0.05).根据ROC曲线得知,到达时间诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.891,灵敏度为74.12%,特异度为88.47%;达峰时间诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的AUC为0.900,灵敏度为76.37%,特异度为85.75%;充盈率诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的AUC为0.875,灵敏度为78.67%,特异度为83.78%:曲线宽度诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的AUC为0.859,灵敏度为79.67%,特异度为81.75%;平均通过时间诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的AUC为0.885,灵敏度为80.24%,特异度为78.54%.五者联合诊断DEB-TACE术后短期效果的AUC为0.993,灵敏度为93.24%,特异度为75.34%.五者联合诊断优于各自单独诊断(Z联合vs到达时间=4.078、Z联合vs达峰时间-3.443,Z联合vs充盈率=4.068,Z联合vs曲线宽度=vs充盈率=4.068,Z联合vs曲线宽度=4.466,Z联合vs平均通过时间=3.723,P均<0.05).结论 DSA灌注成像技术在晚期肝癌患者DEB-TACE术后短期效果评估中有较好的应用价值,可以提供较为客观的依据.
Application Value of Digital Subtraction Angiography Perfusion Imaging Technology in Short-term Efficacy Evaluation of DEB-TACE in Patients with Advanced Liver Cancer
Objective To explore the application value of digital subtraction angiography(DSA)perfusion imaging tech-nology in short-term efficacy evaluation of drug eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(DEB-TACE)in patients with advanced liver cancer.Methods 164 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent DEB-TACE were se-lected as study subjects,and the patients were divided into OR group(complete remission+partial remission)and non-OR group(stable disease+disease progression)according to their short-term postoperative outcomes.All patients underwent DSA perfusion imaging technology testing after surgery;receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of DSA perfusion imaging technology for short-term outcomes after DEB-TACE surgery.Results 164 patients were treated after DEB-TACE,49 in complete remission,55 in partial remission,53 in stable disease,and 7 in disease progression.The arrival time of patients in the non OR group was obviously lower than that in the OR group(P<0.05),while the peak time,filling rate,curve width,and average passage time were obviously higher than those in the OR group(P<0.05).According to the receiver operating characteristic,the area under the curve(AUC)of arrival time in diagnosing short-term effect after DEB-TACE was 0.891,the sen-sitivity was 74.12%,and the specificity was 88.47%.The AUC of peak time in diagnosing short-term effects after DEB-TACE was 0.900,with a sensitivity of 76.37%and a specificity of 85.75%.The AUC of filling rate in diagnosing short-term effects af-ter DEB-TACE was 0.875,sensitivity was 78.67%,and specificity was 83.78%.The AUC of curve width in diagnosing short-term effects after DEB-TACE was 0.859,the sensitivity was 79.67%,and the specificity was 81.75%.The AUC of average passage time in diagnosing short-term effects after DEB-TACE was 0.885,the sensitivity was 80.24%,and the specificity was 78.54%.The AUC of the five combination in diagnosing short-term effects after DEB-TACE was 0.993,the sensitivity was 93.24%,and the specificity was 75.34%.Combined diagnosis of the five is better than separate diagnosis of each(Zcombination vs arrival time=4.078,Zcombination vs peak time=3.443,Zcombination vs filling rate=4.068,Zcombination vs curve width=4.466,Zcombination vs average passage time=3.723,all P<0.05).Conclusion DSA perfusion imaging technology has good application value in short-term efficacy evaluation of late stage liver cancer patients after DEB-TACE surgery,and can provide more objective basis.

Digital subtraction angiography perfusion imaging technologyAdvanced liver cancerDrug eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolizationShort-term effectsEvaluation

于庆、杨春英、靳海英

展开 >

475000 河南大学淮河医院

数字减影血管造影灌注成像技术 晚期肝癌 药物洗脱微球-经动脉化疗栓塞术 短期效果 评估

2024

实用癌症杂志
江西省肿瘤医院 江西省肿瘤研究所

实用癌症杂志

影响因子:1.241
ISSN:1001-5930
年,卷(期):2024.39(10)