首页|无阿片药物全身麻醉联合胸段硬膜外麻醉与常规全麻在胃癌根治术中的应用对比

无阿片药物全身麻醉联合胸段硬膜外麻醉与常规全麻在胃癌根治术中的应用对比

扫码查看
目的 对比分析无阿片药物全身麻醉联合胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)与常规全麻在胃癌根治术中的应用效果.方法 选取行胃癌根治术的92 例患者作为研究对象,采用随机数表法分为研究组和对照组,各 46 例.2 组均接受腹腔镜胃癌根治术,对照组采用常规全麻(舒芬太尼+丙泊酚+依托咪酯+罗库溴铵+咪达唑仑),研究组接受无阿片药物全身麻醉(丙泊酚+依托咪酯+罗库溴铵+咪达唑仑+罗哌卡因)联合TEA.比较2 组围术期指标和插管1 min后(T0)、切皮后5 min(T1)、伤口缝合完毕(T2)、拔管时(T3)的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、Ramsay评分、Prince-Henry评分和麻醉苏醒指标、术后胃肠恢复及不良反应发生率.结果 研究组麻醉时间短于对照组,术中丙泊酚用量少于对照组(P<0.05).研究组T1、T2、T3 时的HR和MAP与T0 时无显著差异(P>0.05);对照组T1、T2、T3 时的HR和MAP与T0 时差异显著(P<0.05);研究组T1、T2、T3 时的HR和MAP均低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组T1、T2、T3 时的Ramsay评分均高于对照组,Prince-Henry评分低于对照组(P<0.05).研究组苏醒时间、拔管时间、首次肛门排气时间、首次下床活动时间和住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05).研究组术后总不良反应发生率为 6.52%,显著低于对照组的 21.74%(P<0.05).结论 与常规全麻比较,无阿片药物全身麻醉联合TEA可稳定胃癌根治术患者围术期血流动力学,提高镇静镇痛效果和麻醉苏醒质量,促进术后胃肠道功能恢复,安全性好.
Comparison of the Application of Opiate-free General Anesthesia Combined with Thorac-ic Epidural Anesthesia and Conventional General Anesthesia in Radical Gastrectomy
Objective To compare and analyze the effect of non-opioid general anesthesia combined with thoracic epi-dural anesthesia(TEA)and conventional general anesthesia in radical gastrectomy of gastric cancer.Methods A total of 92 pa-tients who underwent radical gastrectomy were selected as the research objects,and were divided into the study group and the con-trol group by random number table method,46 patients in each group.Both groups received laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.The control group received conventional general anesthesia(Sufentanil+propofol+etomidate+rocuronium bromide+midazolam),while the study group received opiate-free general anesthesia(propofol+etomidate+rocuronium bromide+midazolam+ropiva-caine)combined with TEA.The perioperative indexes,heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP),Ramsay score,Prince-Hen-ry score and anesthesia recovery index,postoperative gastrointestinal recovery and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the2 groups after 1min of intubation(T0),5min after cuticulation(T1),wound suture completion(T2)and extubation(T3).Results The anesthesia time of the study group was shorter than that of the control group,and the amount of propofol was less than that of the control group(P<0.05).HR and MAP at T1,T2 and T3 were not significantly different from those at T0(P>0.05).HR and MAP of control group at T1,T2 and T3 were significantly different from those at T0(P<0.05).HR and MAP of the study group at T1,T2 and T3 were lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).Ramsay score of the study group at T1,T2 and T3 was higher than that of the control group,Prince-Henry score was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).The re-covery time,extubation time,first anal exhaust time,first getting out of bed time and hospitalization time of the study group were shorter than those of the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions was 6.52%in the study group,which was significantly lower than 21.74%in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with conventional general anesthesia,general anesthesia without opioid combined with TEA can stabilize perioperative hemodynamics in patients un-dergoing radical gastrectomy,improve sedation,analgesia and quality of anesthesia recovery,and promote postoperative gastrointes-tinal function recovery with good safety.

Routine general anesthesiaGeneral anesthesia without opioidsThoracic epidural anesthesiaHemodynam-icsGastrointestinal function

郭培霞、张朔、张新科、王铭、周威、龚青安

展开 >

473000 河南省南阳市中心医院

常规全麻 无阿片药物全身麻醉 胸段硬膜外麻醉 血流动力学 胃肠道功能

2024

实用癌症杂志
江西省肿瘤医院 江西省肿瘤研究所

实用癌症杂志

影响因子:1.241
ISSN:1001-5930
年,卷(期):2024.39(12)