首页|岸基LNG加注码头与LNG码头本质差异对比及设计要点

岸基LNG加注码头与LNG码头本质差异对比及设计要点

扫码查看
为系统研究分析岸基LNG加注码头和LNG码头的关键差异,为设计提供针对性的理论依据,采用规范分析、实践类比、逻辑推理等方法,分析两种码头在代表船型、港址选择、作业工艺、作业量等方面的本质差异,提出安全设计、消防设计方面的总体设计要点.结果表明,岸基LNG加注码头有别于普通货类码头和危险货物码头,是一种特殊性质的港口支持性码头;码头火灾危险性及消防设计宜制定针对性的防火规范,火灾危险性为甲A类,消防设计按照扑灭码头自身初期火灾要求配置;采用水上补给或水陆联合补给时,不改变其加注码头主体性质,合理参照LNG码头做法,做好安全应急预案及现场安全管理.
Comparison of essential differences between shore-based LNG refueling terminals and LNG terminals and key points of design
To systematically study and analyze the key differences between shore-based LNG refueling terminals and LNG terminals,and provide targeted theoretical basis for design,the essential differences between the two terminals in terms of representative ship type,port site selection,operation process and operation volume are analyzed by means of normative analysis,practical analogy and logical reasoning,and the overall design points in terms of safety design and fire protection design are put forward.The results show that the shore-based LNG refueling terminal is different from the general cargo terminal and the dangerous cargo terminal,and it is a kind of port support terminal with special characteristics.Fire risk and fire control design of wharves should formulate targeted fire prevention codes.The fire risk of wharves is class A,and the fire control design should be configured according to the initial fire control requirements of wharves.When using water replenishment or combined water and land replenishment,the main nature of the refueling terminal should not be changed,and the safety emergency plan and on-site safety management should be made with reasonable reference to the practice of LNG terminals.

liquefied natural gasdockbank baserefuelingessential differencecomparison

陈武争

展开 >

中交水运规划设计院有限公司, 北京 100007

上海中交水运设计研究有限公司, 上海 200092

液化天然气 码头 岸基 加注 本质差异 对比

2024

水运工程
中交水运规划设计院有限公司

水运工程

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.428
ISSN:1002-4972
年,卷(期):2024.(4)
  • 18