首页|顺行和逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干中段骨折术后疗效对比

顺行和逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干中段骨折术后疗效对比

扫码查看
目的 比较分析顺行和逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干中段骨折术后的旋转移位和关节功能情况。方法 回顾性分析2019年3月至2021年3月在厦门大学附属东南医院骨科接受髓内钉治疗的45例股骨干中段骨折患者,其中男28例,女17例;年龄18~60岁,平均(39。5±10。4)岁;左侧21例,右侧24例。根据不同的内固定方式进行分组,顺行组26例,男17例,女9例;年龄22~60岁,平均(39。8±11。0)岁;逆行组19例,男11例,女8例;年龄21~60岁,平均(39。2±9。9)岁。记录比较两组术后股骨旋转角度、髋关节功能评分、膝关节功能评分等指标。结果 45例患者术后均获随访,随访时间9~15个月,平均(10。1±3。3)个月。术后即刻顺行组股骨平均旋转角度为(11。4±4。0)°,逆行组为(7。7±4。3)°,逆行组小于顺行组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);术后9个月时顺行组股骨平均旋转角度为(11。2± 4。3)°,逆行组为(7。7±4。0)°,逆行组仍小于顺行组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05);术后9个月,顺行组和逆行组股骨旋转角度较术后即刻对比差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。末次随访时,顺行组Harris评分(90。9±2。7)分,Lysholm评分(92。1±3。1)分;逆行组Harris评分(93。1±2。5)分,Lysholm评分(90。6±2。4)分,差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。膝关节疼痛发生率方面,逆行组(5/19,26。3%)高于顺行组(1/26,3。8%),差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。顺行组和逆行组膝关节屈曲度分别为(130。5±5。4)°和(127。1±4。5)°,顺行组优于逆行组,差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。结论 顺行和逆行髓内钉治疗股骨干中段骨折均可取得较满意的临床疗效。逆行髓内钉术后旋转角度小于顺行髓内钉,同时膝关节屈曲角度小于顺行髓内钉且膝关节疼痛发生率更高。
A Comparative Study of Postoperative Efficacy Between Antegrade and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Middle Femoral Shaft Fractures
Objective To compare the rotational malalignment and joint function outcomes of antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures.Methods A retrospective review was conducted on 45 patients with femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary in the Department of Orthopaedics of Southeast Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen Universit between March 2019 and March 2021.28 males and 17 females were included.The patients aged 18 to 60 years,with a mean age of(39.5±10.4)years.There were 21 cases of the left side and 24 cases of the right side.Based on the fixation method,26 cases were included in the antegrade group(17 males,9 females).The patients aged 22 to 60 years,with a mean age of(39.8±11.0)years.19 cases were inlcuded in the retrograde group(11 males,8 females).The patients aged 21 to 60 years,with a mean age of(39.2±9.9)years.The postoperative femoral rotation angle,Harris hip joint function score,and Lysholm knee joint function score were compared between groups.Results All 45 patients were followed 9 to 15 months,with an average of(10.1±3.3)months.The immediate postoperative femoral rotation angle was(11.4±4.0)° in the antegrade group and(7.7±4.3)° in the retrograde group.The retrograde group exhibited a smaller rotation angle,a difference that was statistically significant(P<0.05).9 months postoperatively,the angles were(11.2±4.3)° and(7.7±4.0)° for the antegrade and retrograde groups respectively,again showing a significant difference(P<0.05).No significant difference in rotation angle was observed at 9 months postoperatively compared to immediately post-surgery(P>0.05).At the final follow-up,the antegrade group had a Harris score of(90.9±2.7)and a Lysholm score of(92.1±3.1),while the retrograde group scored(93.1±2.5)and(90.6±2.4)respectively.The differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).However,the incidence of knee pain in the retrograde group(26.3%)was significantly higher than in the antegrade group(3.8%)(P<0.05).Knee flexion was(130.5±5.4)° in the antegrade group and(127.1±4.5)° in the retrograde group,a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).Conclusion Both antegrade and retrograde intramedullary nailing offer satisfactory clinical outcomes for midshaft femoral fractures.Although the retrograde approach has a smaller postoperative rotational angle,it is associated with reduced knee flexion and a higher incidence of knee pain compared to the antegrade approach

antegrade intramedullary nailingretrograde intramedullary nailingfemoral shaft fracturerotational malalignmentjoint function

宋伟、徐维臻、刘晖、罗德庆、张金辉、吴进

展开 >

联勤保障部队第909医院暨厦门大学附属东南医院骨科,福建漳州 363000

顺行髓内钉 逆行髓内钉 股骨干骨折 旋转移位 关节功能

全军后勤科研项目

20XLS21

2024

实用骨科杂志
中华医学会山西分会,北京大学第三医院

实用骨科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.239
ISSN:1008-5572
年,卷(期):2024.30(1)
  • 24