首页|不同尺骨截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的疗效分析

不同尺骨截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征的疗效分析

扫码查看
目的 对比尺骨茎突关节内截骨与尺骨干横形截骨治疗尺骨撞击综合征患者的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2021年2月至2023年2月唐山市人民医院收治的42例尺骨撞击综合征患者,根据手术方式的不同分为两组。试验组21例接受尺骨茎突关节内截骨术治疗,男12例,女9例;年龄30~60岁,平均(45。70±3。25)岁。对照组21例接受尺骨干横形截骨术治疗,男11例,女10例;年龄30~60岁,平均(45。20±3。56)岁。比较两组术中出血量、切口长度、手术时间、术后截骨断端愈合时间、尺骨高度变化情况,比较两组手术前后疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Cooney腕关节功能评分及随访6个月内并发症发生率。结果 试验组失访1例,对照组失访2例。两组随访时间均为6个月。两组术中出血量、切口长度比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),但试验组手术时间、术后截骨断端愈合时间均短于对照组(P<0。05);术后试验组与对照组尺骨高度均降低,且试验组下降幅度大于对照组(P<0。05)。两组术前、术后6个月VAS及Cooney腕关节功能评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),但术后3个月比较差异有统计学意义(P<0。05)。随访期间两组均未出现切口感染情况;对照组出现2例骨折延迟愈合,1例不愈合情况,并发症发生率15。79%;试验组未出现骨折延迟愈合或不愈合;两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0。05)。结论 应用尺骨茎突关节内截骨术治疗尺骨撞击综合征患者具有较好的治疗效果,可有效解决腕关节功能异常问题,同时在手术时间和术后恢复方面上具有更明显的优势,值得应用和推广。
Analysis of the Efficacy of Different Ulna Osteotomies for Ulnar Impingement Syndrome
Objective To compare the effects of intra-articular ulnar resection and ulnar osteotomy in patients with ulnar impingement syndrome.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 42 patients with ulnar impingement syndrome admitted to Tangshan People'Hospital from February 2021 to February 2023.Patients were divided into tow groups based on different surgical methods.The test group consisted of 21 patients treated with ulnar osteotomy,including 12 males and 9 females;ages ranged from 30 to 60 years,with a mean age of(45.70±3.25)years.The control group included 21 patients treated with ultrasonography-assisted surgery,with 11 males and 10 females;ages ranged from 30 to 60 years,with a mean age of(45.20±3.56)years.Intraoperative bleeding volume,incision length,operation time,postoperative osteotomy healing time,and changes in ulna height were compared.Additionally,the pain visual simulation score after 3 months visual analogue scale(VAS),Cooney wrist function score,and complication rates within 6 months of follow-up were assessed.Results One patient was lost to follow-up in the test group,and two patients in the control group.The follow-up period for both groups was 6 months.There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume and incision length between the two groups(P>0.05),but the operation time and healing time were shorter in the test group than in the control group(P<0.05).The ulna height decreased in both the test and control groups postoperatively,with a greater decrease in the test group compared to the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS scores and Cooney wrist function scores between the two groups immediately postoperatively(P>0.05),but there was a significant difference 3 months after surgery(P<0.05).During the 6-month follow-up,neither group had incision infections;the control group had two delayed fractures and one non-union,resulting in a complication rate of 15.79%;the test group had no delayed fractures or non-unions;there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Ulnar osteotomy for patients with ulnar impingement syndrome is effective,can significantly resolve abnormal wrist function issues,and offers clear advantages in terms of operation time and postoperative recovery,making it a treatment worth applying and promoting.

ulna impingement syndromewrist functionulnar stem processosteotomy

孟小光、徐凤松、史福东

展开 >

河北省唐山市人民医院骨科,河北唐山 063000

尺骨撞击综合征 腕关节功能 尺骨茎突 截骨术

2024

实用骨科杂志
中华医学会山西分会,北京大学第三医院

实用骨科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.239
ISSN:1008-5572
年,卷(期):2024.30(12)