中华全科医学2024,Vol.22Issue(1) :70-73,129.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003333

急性缺血性脑卒中不同时间窗静脉溶栓后再灌注对临床转归及90 d预后的影响分析

Analysis of the effect of reperfusion after intravenous thrombolysis in different time windows of acute ischemic stroke on clinical outcome and 90-day prognosis

寇启星 屈雪萍 刘松灿 孙根 嵇朋
中华全科医学2024,Vol.22Issue(1) :70-73,129.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003333

急性缺血性脑卒中不同时间窗静脉溶栓后再灌注对临床转归及90 d预后的影响分析

Analysis of the effect of reperfusion after intravenous thrombolysis in different time windows of acute ischemic stroke on clinical outcome and 90-day prognosis

寇启星 1屈雪萍 1刘松灿 1孙根 1嵇朋1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 郑州市第三人民医院(河南大学肿瘤医院)北部院区神经内科,河南郑州 450049
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)不同时间窗静脉溶栓后再灌注对临床转归及90 d预后的影响.方法 选取2020年10月-2022年10月在郑州市第三人民医院北部院区神经内科接受静脉溶栓治疗的AIS患者158例,根据溶栓时间窗分为A(42例)、B(53例)、C(63例)3组,溶栓时间窗分别为<3.0 h、3.0~4.5 h及>4.5~<6.0 h,对比3组的临床转归.随访90 d,根据改良Rankin量表(mRS)将患者分为预后良好组(89例)与预后不良组(69例),分析患者90 d预后的影响因素.结果 A组与B组溶栓后的美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)均低于C组,近期预后良好率均高于C组(P<0.05),A组与B组溶栓后NIHSS评分及近期预后良好率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).3组出血事件发生率分别为9.52%(4例)、13.21%(7例)、15.87%(10例),差异无统计学意义(x2=0.882,P>0.05).预后不良组年龄[(67.20±10.33)岁vs.(60.69±10.41岁)]、入院时 NIHSS 评分[(12.35±3.50)分vs.(7.91±2.12)分]、心房颤动占比(17.39%vs.3.37%)、发病后>4.5~<6.0 h溶栓占比(53.62%vs.29.21%)均高于预后良好组(P<0.05).Logistic回归分析显示,高龄、入院高NIHSS评分、心房颤动、溶栓时间窗>4.5~<6.0 h均是AIS患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P<0.05).结论 AIS患者发病后4.5 h内溶栓治疗获益较好,年龄、入院时NIHSS评分、心房颤动、溶栓时间窗均可影响AIS患者90 d预后.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the effect of reperfusion after thrombolysis in different time windows on clinical outcome and 90-day prognosis of acute ischemic stroke(AIS).Methods A total of 158 AIS patients who received intravenous thrombolytic therapy in the Department of Neurology of the Northern Ward of the Third People's Hospital of Zhengzhou from October 2020 to October 2022 wereselected.The patients were divided into three groups according to the thrombolytic time window:A(42 cases),B(53 cases)and C(63 cases).The thrombolytic time windows were<3.0 h,3.0-4.5 h,and>4.5-<6.0 h,respectively.The clinical results of the three groups were compared.After 90 days of follow-up,the patients were divided into a good prognosis group(89 cases)and a poor prognosis group(69 cases)according to the modified Rankin scale(mRS),and the factors influencing the prognosis of the patients at 90 days were analyzed.Results The Na-tional Institutes of health stroke scale(NIHSS)score after thrombolysis in group A and group B was lower than that in group C,and the rate of short-term good prognosis was higher than that in group C(P<0.05).There was no statistical sig-nificance in NIHSS score and short-term good prognosis between group A and group B(P>0.05).The incidence of bleed-ing events in the three groups was 4(9.52%),7(13.21%),and 10(15.87%),respectively,with no significant differ-ence(x2=0.882,P>0.05).In the poor prognosis group,age[(67.20±10.33)vs.(60.69±10.41)years],NIHSS score at admission[(12.35±3.50)points vs.(7.91±2.12)points],proportion of atrial fibrillation(17.39%vs.3.37%)and proportion of thrombolysis>4.5-<6.0 h after onset(53.62%vs.29.21%)were higher than in the good prognosis group(P<0.05).Logistic regression showed that older age,high admission NIHSS score,atrial fibrillation,and thrombol-ysis time window>4.5-<6.0 h were independent risk factors for poor prognosis in AIS patients(P<0.05).Conclusion Thrombolysis is beneficial within 4.5 hours of AIS onset.Age,NIHSS score on admission,atrial fibrillation,and time win-dow of thrombolysis may influence the 90-day prognosis of AIS patients.

关键词

急性缺血性脑卒中/溶栓/重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂/预后

Key words

Acute ischemic stroke/Thrombolysis/Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator/Prognosis

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

河南省科技发展计划项目(222102310473)

出版年

2024
中华全科医学
中华预防医学会,安徽省全科医学会

中华全科医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.688
ISSN:1674-4152
参考文献量20
段落导航相关论文