中华全科医学2024,Vol.22Issue(3) :402-405,409.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003412

阿帕替尼联合用药二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察

Efficacy of apatinib combination in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

卢常青 胡婷 苏方 汪子书
中华全科医学2024,Vol.22Issue(3) :402-405,409.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003412

阿帕替尼联合用药二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察

Efficacy of apatinib combination in second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer

卢常青 1胡婷 1苏方 1汪子书2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科,安徽蚌埠 233004
  • 2. 蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科,安徽蚌埠 233004;蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院癌症转化医学安徽省重点实验室
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 回顾性分析阿帕替尼单药、联合化疗或免疫二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及不良反应,探讨影响疗效的因素.方法 选择2015年1月—2020年12月蚌埠医科大学第一附属医院收治的经一线化疗失败的145例晚期胃癌患者,按照用药方案分为阿帕替尼单药组(36例)、联合化疗组(94例)、联合免疫组(15例).采用Kaplan-Meier法比较3种方案二线治疗晚期胃癌的疗效,应用Cox回归模型分析影响疗效的因素.结果 在晚期胃癌二线治疗中,联合化疗与联合免疫组的中位无进展生存期(mPFS)及中位总生存期(mOS)显著高于阿帕替尼单药组(mPFS,8.3个月 vs.3.6 个月,P<0.001;8.4 个月 vs.3.6 个月,P=0.003;mOS,11.0 个月 vs.7.5 个月,P<0.001;14.0 个月 vs.7.5个月,P<0.001).3种治疗方案的客观缓解率(ORR)依次为5.56%、18.09%、26.67%(P=0.097),疾病控制率(DCR)依次为19.44%、37.23%、33.33%(P=0.151),差异均无统计学意义.3种治疗方案中,Ⅲ~Ⅳ级不良反应发生率依次为22.2%(8/36)、19.1%(18/94)、26.7%(4/15),差异无统计学意义(P=0.863).晚期胃癌患者ECOG评分、有无腹膜转移及是否联合用药与患者的无进展生存期相关,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001).结论 在晚期胃癌二线治疗中,阿帕替尼联合化疗或免疫可以带来更好的疗效,且安全性可靠.

Abstract

Objective To retrospectively analyze the adverse effects and efficacy of apatinib monotherapy,combination chemotherapy,or immune second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer,and to explore the factors that influence treatment efficacy.Methods The study involved 145 patients with advanced gastric cancer who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University between January 2015 and December 2020.The patients were divid-ed into three groups based on their medication regimen:apatinib single-agent group(n=36),combination chemotherapy group(n=94)and combination immunization group(n=15).The effectiveness of the three second-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.The study employed a Cox regression model to an-alyze the factors that impact treatment efficacy.The study employed a Cox regression model to analyze the factors that im-pact treatment efficacy.Results In the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.The combination chemotherapy and combined immunization group showed significantly higher median progression-free survival(mPFS)and median over-all survival(mOS)compared to the apatinib monotherapy group(mPFS,8.3 months vs.3.6 months,P<0.001;8.4 months vs.3.6 months,P=0.003;mOS,11.0 months vs.7.5 months,P<0.001;14.0 months vs.7.5 months,P<0.001).The objective response rates(ORRs)for the three treatments were 5.56%,18.09%and 26.67%(P=0.097),respectively.The disease control rates(DCRs)were 19.44%,37.23%and 33.33%(P=0.151),respec-tively.However,the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).The incidence of grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ adverse reac-tions among the three treatment options was 22.2%(8/36),19.1%(18/94)and 26.7%(4/15),respectively,and the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.863).The statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant correlation between the ECOG score,peritoneal metastasis,and combination and progression-free survival in patients(P<0.001).Conclusion In the second-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer,combining apatinib with chemotherapy or immunotherapy can lead to better efficacy while maintaining reliable safety.

关键词

胃癌/阿帕替尼/联合治疗/疗效/安全性

Key words

Gastric cancer/Apatinib/Combination therapy/Efficacy/Security

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

安徽省高等学校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2019A0329)

安徽省临床医学研究转化专项(202204295107020038)

出版年

2024
中华全科医学
中华预防医学会,安徽省全科医学会

中华全科医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.688
ISSN:1674-4152
参考文献量20
段落导航相关论文