首页|甲类传染病病房管理质量评价指标体系构建

甲类传染病病房管理质量评价指标体系构建

Construction a quality evaluation index system for the management of Class A infectious disease wards

扫码查看
目的 构建具有科学性、可行性的甲类传染病病房管理质量评价指标体系,为规范甲类传染病病房管理提供全面、可量化的参考依据.方法 以Donabedian三维质量理论和服务质量评价模型为基础,于2022年5-7月通过文献检索并参考我国新型冠状病毒肺炎救治管理规范,初步拟定甲类传染病病房管理质量评价指标体系,并分别从传染病医疗、护理管理、临床护理、院感领域以及物流管理等五类人员中遴选函询专家13名,采用德尔菲法对专家进行2轮函询,确定各指标权重.结果 2轮函询中,问卷有效回收率均为100.0%,专家权威系数分别为0.842、0.838.肯德尔协调系数分别为0.116、0.098,x2值分别为180.961、152.882(P<0.01).经过2轮专家函询,最终确立了包含结构质量、过程质量和结果质量3项一级指标,基础性、保障性、规范性、可靠性、科学性、有效性、安全性、经济性8项二级指标,114项三级指标的评价指标体系.3个一级指标权重分别为0.2、0.4、0.4.结论 本研究构建的甲类传染病病房管理质量评价指标体系具有良好的科学性、可靠性和可操作性,指标权重设置合理,专家对指标评价结果一致性较好,可为规范甲类传染病病房管理提供参考依据.
Objective The objective is to construct a scientific and practical quality evaluation index system for managing Class A infectious disease wards,offering a comprehensive and measurable reference framework to standardize their man-agement.Methods Based on Donabedian's three-dimensional quality theory and Service Quality evaluation model,the index system for the management of Class A infectious disease wards was initially constructed through literature research and by referencing China's guidelines for managing novel coronavirus pneumonia.A questionnaire survey involving five categories of personnel was conducted from May to July 2022.The purpose sampling method was adopted to select 13 con-sulting experts specializing in infectious disease healthcare,nursing management,clinical nursing,hospital infection,and logistics management.Two rounds of expert letter consultation and the Delphi method were utilized to finalize the e-valuation index system and determine the weightage of each index.Results The recovery rate and effective rate for both rounds of expert correspondence questionnaires were 100.0%,with expert authority coefficient values of 0.842 and 0.838.Kendall's coefficients of concordance(Kendall's W)for the first and second indexes,following two rounds of letter consultation,were 0.116 and 0.098 respectively.The corresponding chi-square statistics were 180.961 and 152.882,with P-values less than 0.01.The final evaluation index system for managing Class A infectious disease wards include 3 first-level indexes,8 second-level indexes,and 114 third-level indexes.The 3 first-level indexes are structure quality,process quality,and result quality,with weights of 0.2,0.4,and 0.4,respectively.The 8 second-level indexes included fundamentality,supportability,standardization,reliability,scientificity,effectiveness,safety,and economy.Conclusion The quality evaluation index system for managing of Class A infectious disease wards demonstrates excellent scientific validity,reliability,and practicality.The assigned index weights are reasonable,and there is a high level of consistency among expert evaluation results.This system serves as a valuable reference for standardizing the management of Class A infectious disease wards.

Class A infectious diseasesQualityIndicator systemDelphi method

陈莉莉、潘爱红、汤丽、张彤、胡雅晴、胡国治

展开 >

合肥市第一人民医院南区感染性疾病科,安徽合肥 230001

合肥师范学院数学与统计学院,安徽合肥 230601

甲类传染病 质量 指标体系 德尔菲法

安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目安徽省高等学校自然科学研究项目

KJ2021A0929KJ2021A0930

2024

中华全科医学
中华预防医学会,安徽省全科医学会

中华全科医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.688
ISSN:1674-4152
年,卷(期):2024.22(4)
  • 15