首页|盆底超声评估浮针疗法联合揿针穴位埋针治疗压力性尿失禁患者的效果分析

盆底超声评估浮针疗法联合揿针穴位埋针治疗压力性尿失禁患者的效果分析

Pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation of the clinical efficacy of floating needle therapy combined with pressing needle and embedding needle at acupoints in the treatment of patients with stress urinary incontinence

扫码查看
目的 分析浮针疗法联合揿针穴位埋针治疗压力性尿失禁患者的临床疗效,探讨经会阴盆底超声评估其疗效的临床价值.方法 选取2022年9月—2023年11月宁波市中医院治疗的110例压力性尿失禁患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(55例)和实验组(55例).对照组患者应用生物反馈电刺激联合盆底肌训练治疗,实验组应用浮针疗法联合揿针穴位埋针治疗.观察2组患者静息状态下及最大Valsalva动作时超声参数,包括:静息状态下膀胱颈位置、逼尿肌厚度(DWT)、膀胱尿道后角(RVA)及尿道倾斜角(UTA),最大Valsalva动作时膀胱颈移动度(BND)、RVA、尿道旋转角(URA),统计尿道内口漏斗发生率.结果 治疗后,2组患者静息状态下膀胱颈位置及DWT、RVA比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组UTA高于对照组(P<0.05).治疗后,2组患者最大Valsalva动作时,其BND均明显降低(P<0.05),且实验组低于对照组(P<0.05);2组RVA和URA比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).实验组患者尿道内口漏斗发生率为87.27%(48/55),显著低于对照组的100.00%(55/55),差异有统计学意义(x2=5.492,P=0.019).结论 压力性尿失禁患者采用浮针疗法联合揿针穴位埋针治疗疗效更佳,更有利于降低尿道内口漏斗发生率,且经会阴盆底超声对其康复效果的评估具有一定临床参考价值.
Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of floating needle therapy combined with pressing needle point em-bedding therapy in the treatment of patients with stress urinary incontinence,and to explore the clinical value of evalua-.ting its efficacy through perineal pelvic floor ultrasound.Methods A total of 110 patients with stress urinary inconti-nence admitted to Ningbo Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from September 2022 to November 2023 were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into a control group and an experimental group,with 55 cases in each group.The control group was treated with biofeedback electrical stimulation combined with pelvic floor muscle training,and the experimental group was treated with floating needle therapy combined with pressing and embedding acupuncture points.The ultrasound parameters of two groups of patients during resting state and maximum Valsalva maneuver were ob-served,including bladder neck position,detrusor muscle thickness(DWT),urethral inclination angle(UTA),bladder neck movement(BND),posterior angle of bladder urethra(RVA),and urethral rotation angle(URA).The incidence of urethral infundibulum during the maximum Valsalva maneuver was calculated.Results After the treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the resting bladder neck position,DWT,and RVA between the two groups(P>0.05),and the UTA in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).The BND of both groups of patients significantly decreased during the maximum Valsalva maneuver(P<0.05),and the BND in the experi-mental group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05)after the treatment.There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of RVA and URA(P>0.05).The incidence of urethral infundibulum in the experi-mental group was 87.27%(48/55),significantly lower than 100.00%(55/55)in the control group(P<0.05).Con-clusion The combination of floating needle therapy and pressing needle embedding therapy at acupoints is more effective for patients with stress urinary incontinence,which is more conducive to reducing the incidence of urethral infundibulum.The evaluation of the rehabilitation effect by perineal pelvic floor ultrasound has a certain clinical reference value.

Stress urinary incontinencePelvic floor ultrasoundFloating needle therapyPress the needle and bury the needle at the acupointBiofeedback electrical stimulation

王世帅、徐秋栋、陈凤娜

展开 >

浙江中医药大学附属宁波市中医院(宁波市中医院)妇科,浙江宁波 315010

浙江中医药大学附属宁波市中医院(宁波市中医院)超声科

浙江中医药大学附属宁波市中医院(宁波市中医院)泌尿外科

压力性尿失禁 盆底超声 浮针疗法 揿针穴位埋针 生物反馈电刺激

浙江省中医药科技计划宁波市科技计划

2021ZA1262022S087

2024

中华全科医学
中华预防医学会,安徽省全科医学会

中华全科医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.688
ISSN:1674-4152
年,卷(期):2024.22(6)