首页|ε-聚赖氨酸和果胶对溃疡性结肠炎小鼠肠黏膜屏障的影响

ε-聚赖氨酸和果胶对溃疡性结肠炎小鼠肠黏膜屏障的影响

扫码查看
目的 构建溃疡性结肠炎(UC)小鼠模型,探讨ε-聚赖氨酸、果胶及二者混合物对UC小鼠肠黏膜屏障的影响及可能机制.方法 雄性BALB/c小鼠40只,随机分为对照组、UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组、ε聚赖氨酸+果胶组各8只.所有小鼠给予灌胃预处理,对照组、UC组给予饮用水20 mL/(kg·d),ε-聚赖氨酸组给予ε-聚赖氨酸10 mg/(kg·d),果胶组给予果胶200 mg/(kg·d),ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组给予ε-聚赖氨酸10 mg/(kg·d)和果胶200 mg/(kg·d),灌胃4周后,UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组小鼠自由饮用质量分数3%硫酸葡聚糖溶液9 d构建UC模型,对照组自由饮用饮用水9d.造模后评价5组小鼠疾病活动指数(DAI)评分,测量结肠长度,采用HE染色法观察结肠组织病理形态,采用ELISA法检测血清肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)水平,采用实时荧光定量PCR法检测结肠组织闭合蛋白(Occludin)、紧密连接蛋白-1(ZO-1)mRNA相对表达量,采用Western blot法检测结肠组织Toll样受体 4(TLR4)、核因子-κB p65(NF-κB p65)、p-NF-κB p65 蛋白相对表达量,并计算 p-NF-KB p65/NF-KB p65.结果 (1)UC 组[(6.75±1.91)分]、ε-聚赖氨酸组[(5.75±1.75)分]、果胶组[(3.00±0.76)分]、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组[(6.00±3.21)分]DAI评分均高于对照组(0分)(P<0.05);UC组[(6.96±0.78)cm]、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组[(6.79±0.73)cm]结肠长度均短于对照组[(8.10±0.55)cm](P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组与对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组DAI评分均高于果胶组(P<0.05),结肠长度均短于果胶组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组与果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(2)对照组结肠组织黏膜上皮结构完整,腺体排列整齐,隐窝正常.UC组黏膜上皮结构不完整,炎症细胞浸润黏膜层2/3以上,以淋巴细胞浸润为主,病变范围>50%,基底层2/3隐窝被破坏.与UC组比较,ε-聚赖氨酸组黏膜上皮结构尚完整,炎症细胞浸润黏膜层1/3以上,病变范围>25%,基底层1/3隐窝被破坏;果胶组黏膜上皮结构较完整,炎症细胞浸润黏膜层1/3以下,病变范围和隐窝破坏程度明显减小.与果胶组比较,ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组炎症细胞浸润增多,病变范围和隐窝破坏程度增大.(3)UC组、ε聚赖氨酸组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组血清TNF-α水平均高于对照组和果胶组(P<0.05),果胶组与对照组,UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组血清IL-6水平均高于对照组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组与对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组血清IL-6水平均低于UC组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组与UC组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组、ε聚赖氨酸+果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(4)UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组结肠组织Occludin、ZO-1 mRNA相对表达量均低于对照组和果胶组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组与对照组,ε-聚赖氨酸组与果胶组,UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、ε聚赖氨酸+果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(5)UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸十果胶组结肠组织TLR4蛋白相对表达量均高于对照组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组、果胶组与对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、ε-聚赖氨酸十果胶组结肠组织p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65均高于对照组(P<0.05P<0.05),果胶组与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);UC组、ε聚赖氨酸+果胶组结肠组织TLR4蛋白相对表达量及p-NF-KB p65/NF-κB p65均高于果胶组(P<0.05),ε-聚赖氨酸组与果胶组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);UC组、ε-聚赖氨酸组、ε-聚赖氨酸+果胶组结肠组织p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65及TLR4蛋白相对表达量比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 果胶可通过抑制TLR4/NF-KB信号通路减轻结肠组织炎症,保护肠黏膜屏障,预防小鼠UC发生,而ε-聚赖氨酸可减弱果胶对UC小鼠肠黏膜屏障的保护作用.
Effects of ε-polylysine and pectin on intestinal mucosal barrier in mice with ulcerative colitis
Objective To construct mice models of ulcerative colitis(UC),and to investigate the effects of e-polylysine,pectin and their mixture on intestinal mucosal barrier in UC mice and its potential mechanism.Methods Forty male BALB/c mice were randomly divided into control group,UC group,ε-polylysine group,pectin group and ε-polylysine+pectin group,with 8 mice each.All mice were pretreated by gavage:control group and UC group were given 20 mL/(kg·d)of drinking water,e-polylysine group was given 10 mg/(kg·d)of ε-polylysine,pectin group was given 200 mg/(kg·d)of pectin,and ε-polylysine+pectin group was given 10 mg/(kg·d)and 200 mg/(kg·d)pectin.After 4-week gavage,the mice in UC group,ε-polylysine group,pectin group and ε-polylysine+pectin group drank 3%dextroan sulfate solution freely for 9 d to construct UC models,and the mice in control group drank drinking water freely for 9 d.After modeling,the disease activity index(DAI)score was evaluated,the length of the colon was measured,and the pathological morphology of the colon was observed by HE staining method.The serum tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)and interleukin-6(IL-6)levels were detected by ELISA.Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR was used to detect the relative expressions of occludin and zonula occludens-1(ZO-1)mRNAs.Western blot assay was used to detect the relative expressions of Toll-like receptor 4(TLR4),nuclear factor-κB p65(NF-κB p65)and p-NF-κB p65 proteins,and p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 was calculated.Results(1)The DAI score was higher in UC group(6.75±1.91),ε-polylysine group(5.75±1.75),pectin group(3.00±0.76)and ε-polylysine+pectin group(6.00±3.21)than that in control group(0)(P<0.05),was higher in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than that in pectin group(P<0.05),showed no significant difference between ε-polylysine group and pectin group(P>0.05),and among UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).The colon length was shorter in UC group[(6.96±0.78)cm]and ε-polylysine+pectin group[(6.79±0.73)cm]than that in control group[(8.10±0.55)cm](P<0.05),showed no significant difference in ε-polylysine group and pectin group compared with control group(P>0.05),was shorter in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than that in pectin group(P<0.05),and showed no significant difference between ε-polylysine group and pectin group(P>0.05),and among UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).(2)In control group,the mucosal epithelium structure of colon tissue was intact,the glands were arranged neatly,and the crypts were normal.In UC group,the mucosal epithelium structure was incomplete,inflammatory cells infiltrated more than 2/3 of the mucosal layer,mainly lymphocytes infiltrated,the lesion scope was more than 50%,and 2/3 of the basal layer recess was destroyed.Compared with UC group,the mucosal epithelium structure of ε-polylysine group was intact,the inflammatory cells infiltrated more than 1/3 of the mucosal layer,the lesion range was greater than 25%,and 1/3 of the basal layer recess was destroyed;the mucosal epithelium structure of pectin group was more complete,the inflammatory cells infiltrated the mucosal layer less than 1/3,and the lesion scope and the degree of recess destruction were significantly reduced.Compared with pectin group,inflammatory cell infiltration increased in ε-polylysine+pectin group,and the lesion extent and crypt destruction degree enlarged.(3)The serum TNF-α level was higher in UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than that in control group and pectin group(P<0.05),and showed no significant difference between pectin group and control group(P>0.05)and among UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).The serum IL-6 level was higher in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than that in control group(P<0.05),was lower in ε-polylysine group and pectin group than that in UC group(P<0.05),and showed no significant difference in ε-polylysine group and pectin group compared with control group(P>0.05),between ε-polylysine+pectin group and UC group(P>0.05),and among ε-polylysine group,pectin group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).(4)The relative expressions of occludin and ZO-1 mRNAs were lower in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than those in control group and pectin group(P<0.05),and showed no significant differences in ε-polylysine group and pectin group compared with control group,between ε-polylysine group and pectin group and among UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).(5)The relative expression of TLR4 protein was higher in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than that in control group(P<0.05),showed no significant difference in ε-polylysine group and pectin group compared with control group(P>0.05).The p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 was higher in UC group,ε-polylysine group andε-polylysine+pectin group than that in control group(P<0.05),and showed no significant difference between pectin group and control group(P>0.05).The relative expression of TLR4 protein and the p-NF-κB p65/NF-KB p65 were higher in UC group and ε-polylysine+pectin group than those in pectin group(P<0.05),and showed no significant differences between ε-polylysine group and pectin group(P>0.05).There were no significant differences in the relative expression of TLR4 protein and the p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 among UC group,ε-polylysine group and ε-polylysine+pectin group(P>0.05).Conclusion Pectin can prevent UC in mice by inhibiting TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway,reducing colon tissue inflammation and protecting intestinal mucosal barrier,while ε-polylysine can weaken the protective effect of pectin on intestinal mucosal barrier in UC mice.

ulcerative colitisε-polylysinepectinintestinal mucosal barriermice

杨伟明、翟蕾蕾、崔旻、姚萍

展开 >

新疆医科大学第一附属医院消化内科,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐 830014

溃疡性结肠炎 ε-聚赖氨酸 果胶 肠黏膜屏障 小鼠

新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金

2021D01C334

2024

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志
中华预防医学会 河南省人民医院

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.276
ISSN:1674-3474
年,卷(期):2024.38(7)