首页|以基于问题教学法为主的多元整合教学模式在提高临床诊疗能力中的应用

以基于问题教学法为主的多元整合教学模式在提高临床诊疗能力中的应用

扫码查看
目的 探讨以基于问题教学法(PBL)为主联合团队教学法(TBL)、基于案例教学法(CBL)和传统授课教学法(LBL)的多元整合教学模式在中西医结合呼吸内科教学及临床诊疗能力提高中的应用效果.方法 郑州大学人民医院2023级临床医学专业研究生60例,随机分为观察组和对照组各30例.观察组采用以PBL为主联合TBL、CBL和LBL的多元整合教学模式授课,每周先进行1次CBL+LBL课程、再进行1次PBL+TBL课程,每次3课时(120 min),共5周;对照组采用LBL模式授课,每周进行2次课程,每次3课时(120 min),共5周.2组授课前及授课后进行专业知识考试(中医、西医、中西医结合),授课后通过调查问卷(中医学习兴趣、中医四诊能力、中医基础理论知识掌握、综合分析问题能力、探索创新能力、自学能力、查阅文献能力、语言表达能力、团队协作能力、教学方法满意度)评价满意度.结果 观察组、对照组授课后中医成绩[(72.83±3.31)、(67.10±2.63)分]、西医成绩[(90.03±3.46)、(88.80±3.08)分]、中西医结合成绩[(85.53±3.42)、(83.47±3.15)分]、总成绩[(82.25±3.20)、(79.05±2.43)分]均高于授课前[(63.17±2.07)、(63.00±1.95),(79.90±1.63)、(79.80±1.86),(76.07±1.76)、(76.03±1.83),(72.44±1.11)、(72.33±1.25)分](t=-17.267、-8.623、-11.692、-12.514、-15.721、-15.010、-15.831、-18.067,P 均<0.05),授课前2组比较差异均无统计学意义(t=-0.321、-0.221、-0.072、-0.371,P均>0.05).授课后观察组中医成绩、中西医结合成绩、总成绩均高于对照组(t=-7.424,P<0.001;t=-2.435,P=0.018;t=-4.362,P<0.001),西医成绩与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(t=-1.459,P=0.150).观察组中医学习兴趣、中医四诊能力、中医基础理论知识掌握、综合分析问题能力、探索创新能力、自学能力、查阅文献能力、语言表达能力、团队协作能力、教学方法满意度评价为非常满意比率(53.33%、53.33%、56.67%、46.67%、50.00%、50.00%、46.67%、43.33%、56.67%、56.67%)均高于对照组(20.00%、23.33%、23.33%、16.67%、23.33%、23.33%、13.33%、13.33%、23.33%、26.67%)(Z=-2.049、-2.025、-2.336、-3.027、-2.091、-1.992、-3.263、-3.138、-2.221、-1.976,P 均<0.05).结论 与 LBL 相比,以PBL为主的多元整合教学模式在中西医结合呼吸内科教学中的效果更显著,可提升临床医学专业研究生的中西医结合理论知识和技能水平,提高临床诊疗能力.
Multi-element integrated teaching mode based on Problem-Based Learning in improving clinical diagnosis and treatment ability
Objective To investigate the effect of multi-element integrated teaching mode of Problem-Based Learning(PBL)as the main body combined with Team-Based Learning(TBL),Case-Based Learning(CBL)and Traditional Lecture-Based Learning(LBL)on the ability improvement of teaching and clinical diagnosis and treatment in integrated traditional Chinese and Western respiratory medicine.Methods Sixty clinical medical graduate students of Grade 2023 in Zhengzhou University People's Hospital were randomly divided into observation group(n=30)and control group(n=30).The students in observation group received one CBL+LBL course and one PBL+TBL course per week in the multi-element integrated teaching mode(PBL as the main body,in combination with TBL,CBL and LBL),3 class hours(120 min)each course,totally for 5 weeks.The students in control group received two courses per week in LBL mode,with 3 class hours(120 min)each course,totally for 5 weeks.Both two groups received professional knowledge exams(3 items:traditional Chinese medicine,Western medicine,integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine)before and after training.The satisfaction was evaluated through questionnaire(10 items:learning interest in traditional Chinese medicine,and ability of four traditional Chinese medical diagnostic methods,mastery of basic theoretical knowledge of traditional Chinese medicine,comprehensive analysis ability,exploration and innovation ability,self-learning ability,literature review ability,language expression ability,team cooperation ability,and teaching method satisfaction)after training in two groups.Results The traditional Chinese medicine scores(72.83±3.31,67.10±2.63),Western medicine scores(90.03±3.46,88.80±3.08),integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine scores(85.53±3.42,83.47±3.15)and total scores(82.25±3.20,79.05±2.43)were higher in observation and control groups after training than those before training(63.17±2.07,63.00±1.95;79.90±1.63,79.80±1.86;76.07±1.76,76.03±1.83;72.44±1.11,72.33±1.25)(t=-17.267,-8.623,-11.692,-12.514,-15.721,-15.010,-15.831,-18.067;all P values<0.05),and showed no significant differences between two groups before training(t=-0.321,-0.221,-0.072,-0.371;all P values>0.05).The traditional Chinese medicine score,integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine score,and total score were higher in observation group than those in control group after training(t=-7.424,P<0.001;t=-2.435,P=0.018;t=-4.362,P<0.001),and Western medicine score showed no significant difference between two groups(t=-1.459,P=0.150).The satisfaction rates in learning interest in traditional Chinese medicine,ability of four traditional Chinese medical diagnostic methods,mastery of basic theoretical knowledge of traditional Chinese medicine,comprehensive analysis ability,exploration and innovation ability,self-learning ability,literature review ability,language expression ability,team cooperation ability and teaching method were higher in observation group(53.33%,53.33%,56.67%,46.67%,50.00%,50.00%,46.67%,43.33%,56.67%,56.67%)than those in control group(20.00%,23.33%,23.33%,16.67%,23.33%,23.33%,13.33%,13.33%,23.33%,26.67%)(Z=-2.049,-2.025,-2.336,-3.027,-2.091,-1.992,-3.263,-3.138,-2.221,-1.976;all P values<0.05).Conclusion Compared with LBL,the PBL-based multi-element integrated teaching mode is more effective in the teaching of integrated traditional Chinese and Western respiratory medicine,and it can improve the theoretical knowledge,skill level,and diagnosis and treatment ability of clinical medical graduate students.

Problem-Based Learningrespiratory medicineclinical diagnosis and treatmentintegrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine

赵瑞娟、雷佳慧、陈子恒、陈敏、马可欣、赵丽敏

展开 >

郑州大学人民医院河南省人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科,河南郑州 450003

河南中医药大学第一临床医学院,河南 郑州 450000

河南省人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科 郑州大学人民医院,河南 郑州 450003

基于问题教学法 呼吸内科 临床诊疗 中西医结合

郑州大学教育教学改革研究与实践项目河南中医药大学研究生教育教学改革研究与实践项目

2023ZZUJGXM113YJSJ2023-029

2024

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志
中华预防医学会 河南省人民医院

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.276
ISSN:1674-3474
年,卷(期):2024.38(8)
  • 11