首页|化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂一线治疗KRAS突变晚期肺腺癌的效果

化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂一线治疗KRAS突变晚期肺腺癌的效果

扫码查看
目的 比较KRAS突变晚期肺腺癌患者一线治疗采用培美曲塞+卡铂/奈达铂化疗联合程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)抑制剂或联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的效果及安全性,探讨程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)水平对培美曲塞+卡铂/奈达铂化疗联合PD-1抑制剂治疗效果的影响.方法 2019年10月-2023年6月河南省人民医院初诊KRAS突变晚期肺腺癌患者72例,一线治疗采用培美曲塞+卡铂/奈达铂化疗联合PD-1抑制剂者38例为免疫治疗组,采用培美曲塞+卡铂/奈达铂化疗联合贝伐珠单抗者34例为抗血管治疗组.治疗4个周期后评价客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR),记录不良反应发生情况.随访至2024年3月1日,记录2组无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存时间(OS).将免疫治疗组患者依据PD-L1表达分为阳性组(PD-L1≥1%)与阴性组(PD-L1<1%),比较阳性组与阴性组治疗4个周期后的ORR、DCR以及PFS、OS.结果 (1)免疫治疗组ORR(44.7%)、DCR(84.2%)与抗血管治疗组(35.3%、76.5%)比较差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.665,P=0.415;x2=0.039,P=0.844).免疫治疗组中位PFS[7.9个月(95%CI:5.8~10.0个月)]、中位OS[19.8个月(95%CI:14.8~24.8个月)]均长于抗血管治疗组[5.2个月(95%CI:4.6~5.7个月)、14.2个月(95%CI:10.2~18.2个月)](P=0.040;P=0.046).(2)免疫治疗组甲状腺功能异常发生率(15.8%)高于抗血管治疗组(0)(P<0.05),高血压发生率(2.6%)低于抗血管治疗组(35.3%)(P<0.05),粒细胞减少、血小板减少等发生率与抗血管治疗组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).(3)PD-L1阳性组ORR、DCR、中位PFS及OS与PD-L1阴性组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 KRAS突变晚期肺腺癌患者一线治疗采用培美曲塞+卡铂/奈达铂化疗联合PD-1抑制剂或联合贝伐珠单抗方案均具有较好的近期疗效,安全性好,联合PD-1抑制剂可延长患者的PFS、OS且不受PD-L1表达的影响.
Efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in first-line treatment of KRAS mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed+carboplatin/nedaplatin chemotherapy plus programmed cell death-1(PD-1)inhibitor versus plus bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of KRAS mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma,and to investigate the influence of PD ligand-1(PD-L1)level on the therapeutic efficacy of pemetrexed+carboplatin/nedaplatin chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor.Methods Seventy-two patients were initially diagnosed with KRAS mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from October 2019 to June 2023,among whom 38 patients received pemetrexed+carboplatin/nedaplatin chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor(immunotherapy group)and 34 patients received pemetrexed+carboplatin/nedaplatin chemotherapy plus bevacizumab(anti-angiogenic therapy group).The objective response rate(ORR),disease control rate(DCR)after 4 cycles of treatment and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between two groups.The patients were followed up till March 1,2024,to record the progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS).The patients in immunotherapy group were divided into positive group(PD-L1 ≥1%)and negative group(PD-L1<1%),and the ORR,DCR,PFS and OS were compared between positive and negative groups after 4 cycles of treatment.Results(1)There were no significant differences in ORR and DCR between immunotherapy group(44.7%,84.2%)and anti-angiogenic therapy group(35.3%,76.5%)(x2=0.665,P=0.415;x2=0.039,P=0.844).The median PFS and median OS were longer in immunotherapy group[7.9 months(95%CI:5.8-10.0 months),19.8 months(95%CI:14.8-24.8 months)]than those in anti-angiogenic therapy group[5.2 months(95%CI:4.6-5.7 months),14.2 months(95%CI:10.2-18.2 months)](P=0.040,P=0.046).(2)The incidence of thyroid dysfunction was higher in immunotherapy group(15.8%)than that in anti-angiogenic therapy group(0)(P<0.05),the incidence of hypertension was lower in immunotherapy group(2.6%)than that in anti-angiogenic therapy group(35.3%)(P<0.05),and there were no significant differences in the incidences of granulocytopenia,thrombocytopenia and other adverse reactions between two groups(P>0.05).(3)There were no significant differences in the ORR,DCR,median PFS and median OS between positive and negative groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Both pemetrexed+carboplatin/nedaplatin chemotheray plus PD-1 inhibitor and plus bevacizumab have good short-term efficacy and safety in patients with KRAS mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma,and chemotherapy plus PD-1 inhibitor can prolong PFS and OS without being affected by PD-L1 expression.

advanced lung adenocarcinomaKRAS gene mutationfirst-line treatmentimmune checkpoint inhibitorsbevacizumab

刘珊珊、高天慧、赵孟阳、王怡君、潘利贞

展开 >

河南大学人民医院河南省人民医院肿瘤中心,河南郑州 450003

晚期肺腺癌 KRAS突变 一线治疗 免疫检查点抑制剂 贝伐珠单抗

河南省医学科技攻关计划项目

LHGJ20210040

2024

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志
中华预防医学会 河南省人民医院

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.276
ISSN:1674-3474
年,卷(期):2024.38(9)
  • 3