首页|TET2基因突变对弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响

TET2基因突变对弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者预后的影响

扫码查看
目的 观察弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者TET2基因突变情况,探讨TET2基因突变对DLBCL患者预后的影响。方法 2019年1月-2021年12月河南省肿瘤医院初诊DLBCL患者145例,均行宏基因组二代测序检测TET2基因突变情况,根据TET2基因突变情况分为突变组35例和未突变组110例,对2组进行倾向性评分匹配,比较2组匹配前、后年龄、Lugano分期、淋巴瘤国际预后指数(IPI)评分等临床资料。随访1~3年,记录2组生存情况,绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线,比较2组3年总生存率、无进展生存率。采用多因素Cox回归分析DLBCL患者疾病进展的影响因素。结果 倾向性评分匹配前,突变组年龄≥60岁(57。14%)、IPI评分3~5分(54。29%)比率均高于未突变组(32。73%、27。27%)(x2=6。677,P=0。010;x2=8。660,P=0。003);倾向性评分匹配后,突变组年龄≥60 岁(50。00%)、IPI评分3~5分(46。67%)与未突变组(56。67%、33。33%)比较差异均无统计学意义(x2=0。268,P=0。605;x2=1。111,P=0。292)。随访25(18,34)个月,突变组中位无进展生存期为20个月,中位总生存期为26个月;未突变组中位无进展生存期为30个月,中位总生存期未达到(随访时间截止时终点事件未发生);突变组3年无进展生存率(17。3%)、3年总生存率(25。9%)均低于未突变组(37。2%、50。6%)(x2=5。046,P=0。025;x2=5。061,P=0。024)。TET2 基因突变是DLBCL患者疾病进展的影响因素(HR=2。396,95%CI:1。065~5。388,P=0。035)。结论 伴TET2基因突变的DLBCL患者疾病进展的风险较大。
Impact of TET2 gene mutations on the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Objective To observe the TET2 gene mutations in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma(DLBCL),and to investigate its impact on the prognosis of DLBCL patients.Methods From January 2019 to December 2021,145 patients with initially diagnosed DLBCL in Henan Cancer Hospital underwent next-generation sequencing to assess mutations in TET2 gene,and were classified into the mutation group(n=35)and the no-mutation group(n=110)based on TET2 mutation status.Propensity score matching was performed to compare the baseline clinical data including age,Lugano stage,and International Prognostic Index(IPI)score before and after matching between two groups.Patients were followed for 1 to 3 years to record the survival in two groups.Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to compare the rates of overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS).Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors influencing disease progression of DLBCL patients.Results Before propensity score matching,the mutation group exhibited higher proportions of patients aged ≥60 years(57.14%)and with IPI score of 3-5(54.29%)compared to the no-mutation group(32.73%,27.27%)(x2=6.677,P=0.010;x2=8.660,P=0.003).After propensity score matching,the proportions of patients aged ≥60 years and with IPI score of 3-5 did not differ significantly between the mutation group(50.00%,46.67%)and the no-mutation group(56.67%,33.33%)(x2=0.268,P=0.605;x2=1.111,P=0.292).The follow-up duration was 25(18,34)months.The median PFS of the mutation group was 20 months,while the median OS was 26 months.For the no-mutation group,the median PFS was 30 months,and the median OS had not been reached(no endpoint events developed at the time of the latest follow-up).The 3-year PFS rate and 3-year OS rate were significantly lower in the mutation group(17.3%,25.9%)than those in the no-mutation group(37.2%,50.6%)(x2=5.046,P=0.025;x2=5.061,P=0.024).TET2 gene mutation was an influencing factor of disease progression in DLBCL patients(HR=2.396,95%CI:1.065-5.388,P=0.035).Conclusion DLBCL patients with TET2 gene mutation are at an increased risk of disease progression.

diffuse large B-cell lymphomaTET2 genemutationprognosis

胡雨菡、王杰浩、马怡晨、闫艳、姚志华、秦娜、高雪、杜建伟、董丽华、纪旭、王业生、李玉富、林全德

展开 >

郑州大学附属肿瘤医院河南省肿瘤医院血液科,河南郑州 450003

郑州第一人民医院消化科,河南郑州 450004

新疆医科大学第一临床医学院,新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐 830054

周口市中心医院感染科,河南周口 466009

河南中医药大学人民医院郑州人民医院血液科,河南 郑州 450053

展开 >

弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤 TET2基因 突变 预后

2024

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志
中华预防医学会 河南省人民医院

中华实用诊断与治疗杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.276
ISSN:1674-3474
年,卷(期):2024.38(12)