When autonomous decision-making by artificial intelligence(AI)leads to harmful outcomes,the determination for the attribution of results is a crucial factor regarding the study of the application of criminal law on AI issues.In the causal process of autonomous intelligent decision-making,the problem of attributing respon-sibility arises in both factual determination and normative evaluation,which presenting challenges to intentional and negligent offenses.The existing theoretical approaches have sidestepped post-hoc regulation of algorithmic harm.The decision-making by AI is not an intervention in the normative sense and does not pose an obstacle to attributing results,whereas the Result Attribution does not require a comprehensive explanation of algorithmic models,instead,it involves establishing the"basic factual connection"between the behavior and the harm.In specific determinations,the post-hoc confirmation of the real causal relationship between behavior and the results shall be compulsory.When there are multiple responsible parties,attributing the outcomes involves with the assessment of the interrelationship of behaviors and the evaluation of the respective causal effects.
关键词
通用型人工智能/自主决策/ChatGPT/结果归属
Key words
Artificial General Intelligence/Autonomous Decision-making/ChatGPT/Result Attribution
万方数据