首页|回顾与展望:刑事辩护制度修改的系统方案

回顾与展望:刑事辩护制度修改的系统方案

扫码查看
《刑事诉讼法》第四次修改在即,辩护制度的修改应是重中之重.从 1979 年《刑事诉讼法》实施至今,我国刑事辩护制度历经初建阶段、发展阶段、完善阶段与创新发展阶段四个时期,从发展脉络及制度现状来看,其存在理念滞后、原则缺失、伦理规范缺位、规则内容不尽等问题.必须正视我国经济社会高速发展、司法改革深入推进、辩护理论快速演进等对辩护制度的推动与冲击,站在中国立场,以国际视野,解决辩护问题.借由本次《刑事诉讼法》修改,应当在总则中确立"犯罪嫌疑人、被告人有权辩护""辩护律师独立权""犯罪嫌疑人、被告人有权获得法律援助"等一般性原则,在"辩护与代理"章首确立"有效辩护"原则、辩护律师"忠诚义务"伦理规则;还应赋予辩护律师讯问在场权、逮捕阶段阅卷权,取消非律师辩护、辩护律师人数限制,明确委托辩护优于指定辩护等相关规则.
Review and Prospect:A Systematic Plan for the Legislative Amendment of the Criminal Defense System
The Fourth Amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law is coming,and the revision of the defense system should be of utmost importance.Since the implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law in 1979,China's criminal defense system has gone through four stages:the initial establishment stage,the development stage,the improvement stage,and the innovation stage.In terms of the development context and current situation of the criminal defense system,there are several problems including outdated concepts,lack of principles,lack of ethical norms,and incomplete rule content.We must contemplate the impact of defense system caused by the rapid development of China's economy and society,the deepening of judicial reform,and quick evolution of vindication theory.We must stand on the Chinese side and solve defense issues with an international perspective.With this amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law,general principles should be established such as"defendant's rights to defend","defense lawyers'independent rights to defense",and"defendant's rights to legal aid"in the general provisions.The principle of"effective representation"and the ethical rules of"defense lawyer's loyalty obligation"should be established at the beginning of the"Defense and Representation"chapter;Defense lawyer's right to be present during questioning,the restriction on the number of non-lawyer defense and defense lawyers should be abolished,and relevant rules such as the clarification of superiority of entrusted defense over designated defense.

defense systemdefence rightseffective representationethics of defense

刘仁琦

展开 >

西北政法大学 刑事法学院,西安 710122

辩护制度 辩护权 有效辩护 辩护伦理

2025

苏州大学学报(社会科学版)
苏州大学

苏州大学学报(社会科学版)

北大核心
影响因子:0.849
ISSN:1001-4403
年,卷(期):2025.46(1)