首页|刑事诉讼证人作证制度的层级化改革

刑事诉讼证人作证制度的层级化改革

扫码查看
刑事诉讼证人作证制度具有推进案件事实及时查明和保护被告人对质诘问权的双重面向,不可偏废.然而,目前的制度设计却将重点过度置于确保国家刑罚权的落实,忽略了基本权的保护,形成了"要么出庭作证,要么宣读证言"的二元格局,这是"证人出庭作证难"的重要根源.鉴于证人当庭接受质询是保护被告人对质诘问权的最佳方式,其他非当庭作证措施均属基本权干预,故应按照法律保留明确性和比例原则适当性的要求,对证人作证制度进行调整.在《刑事诉讼法》再修改的背景下,立法者需考虑基于基本权干预的程度及影响案件正常办理的风险,构建包括出庭作证、在线作证、不出庭作证以及其他配套作证措施的层级化体系,以兼顾不同情形的实践需求.
Hierarchical Reform of the Witness Testimony System in Criminal Procedure
The witness testimony system in criminal procedure serves the dual purposes of facilitating the timely ascertainment of case facts and protecting the defendant's right to confront witnesses.However,the current system design places excessive emphasis on ensuring the enforcement of state penal power,neglecting the protection of fundamental rights.This has resulted in a binary framework of"either testify in court or have the testimony read out",which is a major cause of the difficulty in having witnesses testify in court.Given that having witnesses testify in court is the best way to protect the defendant's right of confrontation,any alternative measures that do not involve testifying in court constitute an interference with fundamental rights.Therefore,the witness testimony system should be adjusted according to the requirements of clarity in legal reservation and proportionality.Against the backdrop of the forthcoming amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law,legislators should consider the degree of interference with fundamental rights and the risk of affecting the normal handling of cases,and establish a hierarchical system that includes in-court testimony,online testimony,non-appearance testimony,and other supplementary measures,to balance the practical needs of different situations.

criminal actionattendance of witnessright of cross-examinationbasic rights intervention

聂友伦

展开 >

华东师范大学 法学院,上海 220241

刑事诉讼 证人出庭 对质诘问权 基本权干预

2025

苏州大学学报(社会科学版)
苏州大学

苏州大学学报(社会科学版)

北大核心
影响因子:0.849
ISSN:1001-4403
年,卷(期):2025.46(1)