首页|男性弱精子症与肠道微生物组关联性研究

男性弱精子症与肠道微生物组关联性研究

扫码查看
目的 探究肠道微生物组与弱精子症之间的关系.方法 本研究为病例对照研究,共纳入2021年1月至2021年6月期间在沈阳菁华医院男科就诊的32例轻中度弱精子症男性(记为弱精子症组)和30名精液正常男性(记为对照组),回顾性收集基础信息,检测精液质量,利用16S rDNA全长组装测序技术(16S rDNA full length assembly sequencing technology,16S-FAST)检测粪便内肠道细菌的丰度.结果 弱精子症组患者精子总数[112.22×106(79.13×106,179.76×106)]、前向运动率[22.93%(16.71%,28.02%)]、非前向运动率[5.60%(3.98%,7.62%)]均显著低于对照组[166.76×106(110.17×106,262.79×106),P=0.022;42.37%(35.21%,57.88%),P<0.001;8.82%(6.18%,11.14%),P=0.001],不动精子率[72.19%(65.27%,78.92%)]显著高于对照组[50.88%(33.33%,56.24%),P<0.001].两组间年龄与体质量指数在组间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05).参与人群的肠道微生物组可分为肠型1(拟杆菌肠型)和肠型2(普氏菌肠型).在两种肠型的样本中,α多样性在弱精子症组和对照组中差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);在肠型2的样本中,弱精子症组与对照组的菌群β多样性存在差异,且弱精子症组男性肠道内的变形菌门显著高于对照组,梭状芽孢杆菌(Clostridium sp.)、布氏瘤胃球 菌(Ruminococcus bromii)、Phocea massiliensis、双 孢 梭 菌(C.disporicum)、Tyzzerella sp.Marseille_P3062、解脲霍华德菌(Howardella ureilytica)、产气荚膜梭菌(C.perfringens)以及C.sp.BG-C151等菌种更为丰富(线性判别分析,linear discriminant analysis,LDA>2);而在肠型1的样本中,菌群β多样性组间比较差异未见统计学意义(P>0.05).此外,KEGG分析显示,在肠型2的样本中,与差异菌关联密切的硫胺素代谢通路 PATH ko00730通路在弱精子症组的富集明显低于对照组(LDA>2).结论 弱精子症男性和精液正常男性的肠道微生物组和KEGG功能通路在肠型2人群中存在显著差异,而在肠型1人群未见差异,肠道微生物组变化可能对特定人群的精子活力存在影响.
Correlation between male asthenospermia and intestinal microbiome
Objective To explore the relationship between intestinal microbiomes and asthenospermia.Methods This was a retrospective case control study.A total of 32 men with asthenospermia and 30 normal men(named control group)were included.The subjects were recruited from Department of Andrology of Shenyang Jinghua Hospital from January 2021 to June 2021.Basic information was collected,semen quality was tested,abundance of intestinal bacteria in feces was detected using 16S rDNA full length assembly sequencing technology(16S-FAST).Results In patients with asthenospermia,the total sperm count[112.22×106(79.13×106,179.76×106)],forward progressive motility rate[22.93%(16.71%,28.02%)],non-forward progressive motility rate[5.60%(3.98%,7.62%)]were significantly lower and immobile sperm rate[72.19%(65.27%,78.92%)]was significantly higher than those of control group[166.76×106(110.17×106,262.79×106),P=0.022;42.37%(35.21%,57.88%),P<0.001;8.82%(6.18%,11.14%),P=0.001;50.88%(33.33%,56.24%),P<0.001],and there were no significant differences in age and body mass index between the two groups(all P>0.05).The participating population can be divided into enterotype 1(Bacteroide enterotype)and enterotype 2(Prevotella enterotype).There was no significant difference in α diversity between asthenospermia group and control group in two enterotypes(all P>0.05).In the population with enterotype 2,β diversity analysis clearly separated the microbiome of men with asthenospermia and healthy controls,and the abundance of Proteobacteria phylum,Clostridium sp.,Ruminococcus bromii,Phocea massiensis,C.disporicum,Tyzzerella sp.Marseille_P3062,Howardella ureilytica,C.perfringens,and C.sp.BG-C151 species were more abundant in men with asthenospermia compared with control group[linear discriminant analysis(LDA)>2];while in the population with enterotype 1,β diversity analysis could not separate the microbiome of men with asthenospermia and non-asthenospermia men(P>0.05).In addition,KEGG analysis showed that in the population with enterotype 2,thiamine metabolism PATH ko00730 pathway,which was closely related to differential bacteria,was significantly less abundant in asthenospermia group than in control group(LDA>2).Conclusion The intestinal microbiome and KEGG functional pathways differed significantly between asthenospermia and normozoospermia in population with enterotype 2,while there was no difference in the enterotype 1 population.Changes in intestinal microbiome may have an impact on sperm motility in specific populations.

AsthenospermiaIntestinal microbiomeInfertility

李芃、孙龙浩、赵唤、宋世威、许蓬

展开 >

沈阳菁华医院男科,沈阳 110000

弱精子症 肠道微生物组 不孕症

2020年度沈阳市科学技术计划沈阳科技人才应用技术研究计划沈阳科技创新环境营造计划

20-205-4-00618-014-4-5619-110-4-23

2024

中华生殖与避孕杂志
上海计划生育科学研究所

中华生殖与避孕杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.989
ISSN:2096-2916
年,卷(期):2024.44(2)
  • 32