首页|自然周期卵泡早排的预测及提前取卵价值评估

自然周期卵泡早排的预测及提前取卵价值评估

扫码查看
目的 探究卵巢储备功能减退(DOR)患者采用自然周期体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射-胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)助孕中影响卵母细胞提前排逸的因素,比较患者扳机后提前及正常取卵的治疗结局,评价提前取卵的临床应用价值。方法 回顾性队列研究分析2020年1月至2023年4月期间于南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心采用自然周期IVF/ICSI-ET助孕的815名DOR患者临床资料,根据取卵日卵母细胞是否提前排逸分为取卵日卵母细胞未早排组(A组,n=712)和取卵日卵母细胞早排组(B组,n=103)。再依据扳机后取卵时间分别将A、B两组细分:扳机后36 h取卵(A1组和B1组,扳机日血LH<20 U/L)和扳机后24 h取卵(A2组和B2组,扳机日血LH≥20 U/L),分析比较4组患者的临床数据及妊娠结局。结果 各组患者的年龄、体质量指数(BMI)、抗苗勒管激素水平及月经情况等差异均无统计学意义(P>0。05)。促排卵情况比较:取卵时间相同时,未早排患者与早排组相比(即A1组与B1组、A2组与B2组相比),取卵周期起始第3天最大卵泡直径、卵泡刺激素(FSH)、黄体生成素(LH)、雌二醇(E2)水平及扳机药物种类差异无统计学意义(P均>0。05);A1组患者扳机日E2、LH及孕酮(P)水平均显著低于B1组(P均<0。05)。卵母细胞未早排两组间实验室及临床结局比较:正常取卵A1组的受精率及卵裂率均较提前取卵的A2组显著提高,而A2组无可移植胚胎率显著高于A1组(P均<0。05);两组间的未获卵率、胚胎形成率、优质胚胎率、囊胚形成率、优质囊胚率、鲜胚移植率、全胚冷冻率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0。05);在鲜胚移植周期中,两组间的HCG阳性率、临床妊娠率、流产率、活产率差异无统计学意义(P>0。05),但A1组的累积HCG阳性率、累积临床妊娠率、累积活产率均显著高于A2组(P均<0。05)。结论 在自然周期卵泡发育过程中,若LH峰提前出现,相比正常时间收集卵母细胞,采取扳机后提前取卵虽然增加了获卵数,但并不能改善患者的助孕结局。在取卵周期的起始阶段,尚缺乏有效指标来预测本周期LH峰的提前出现及卵母细胞早排的风险。
Pre-ovulation prediction and clinical value evaluate for emergency oocyte retrieval in natural cycle
Objective:To investigate the factors related to premature ovulation in natural cycles,and to compare the clinical parameters and pregnancy outcomes of diminished ovarian reserve(DOR)patients with or without emergency oocyte retrieval,and to analyze the clinical value for emergency oocyte retrieval on natural cycle in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer(IVF/ICSI-ET).Methods:This was a retrospective cohort study.A total of 815 DOR patients who underwent natural cycle protocol of in IVF/ICSI-ET in Center of Reproductive Medicine of The First Affiliated Hospital,Nanjing Medical University between January 2020 to April 2023 were divided into group A(n=712)and group B(n=103)according to whether the oocytes were ovulated prematurely on the day of retrieval.According to the time of oocyte retrieval after the trigger,groups A and B were further divided into two groups:oocyte retrieval at 36 hours after the trigger(A1 and B1 groups,luteinizing hormone(LH)<20 U/L on the trigger day)and egg retrieval at 24 hours after the trigger(A2 and B2 groups,LH≥20 U/L on the trigger day).The general data and pregnancy outcomes were compared among these four groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the age,body mass index(BMI),serum level of anti-Mullerian hormone and menstrual status among all groups(P>0).05).As for the ovulation induction,when the time of oocyte retrieval was the same,there were no statistically significant differences in the maximum follicle diameter,levels of follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH),LH as well as estradiol(E2),and trigger drug types on the third day of the oocyte retrieval cycle when A1 group compared with B1 group and A2 group compared with B2 group(P>0.05).The average levels of E2,LH and progesterone(P)on the trigger day in group A1 were significantly lower than those in group B1(P<0.05).The results of the comparison of laboratory and clinical outcomes between group A1 and group A2 showed that the fertilization rate and the cleavage rate of group A1 with normal oocyte retrieval were significantly higher than those of group A2 with early oocyte retrieval,while the rate of no transferable embryos in group A2 was significantly higher than that in group A1(P<0.05),and there were no statistically significant differences in the rates of unacquired oocyte,embryo formation,high-quality embryo,blastocyst formation,high-quality blastocyst,fresh embryo transfer,and whole embryo freezing between the two groups(P>0.05).In the fresh embryo transfer cycle,there were no statistically significant differences with regard to human chorionic gonadotropin(hCG)positive rate,clinical pregnancy rate,miscarriage rate,and live birth rate between group A1 and group A2(P>0.05),but the cumulative hCG positive rate,cumulative clinical pregnancy rate,and cumulative live birth rate in Group A1 were significantly higher than those in Group A2(P<0.05).Conclusions:For patients with elevated LH on trigger day,emergency oocyte retrieval could only increase the retrieved oocyte number,and has no advantage for the final pregnancy outcomes according to the cumulative pregnancy results.There are no effective indicators to predict the risk of pre-ovulation,especially at the beginning of the natural cycle.

Natural cycleEmergency oocyte retrievalAssisted reproductive technologyDiminished ovarian reservePregnancy outcome

徐嗣亮、夏心如、蒋春艳、钱易、李梅、马翔、刁飞扬、刘嘉茵、高彦

展开 >

南京医科大学第一附属医院生殖医学中心,南京 210029

自然周期 提前取卵 辅助生殖 卵巢功能减退 妊娠结局

国家自然科学青年基金

82001508

2024

生殖医学杂志
北京协和医院 国家人口计生委科学技术研究所

生殖医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.24
ISSN:1004-3845
年,卷(期):2024.33(3)
  • 21