首页|不同宫腔灌注方法对薄型子宫内膜患者冻融胚胎移植周期妊娠结局的影响

不同宫腔灌注方法对薄型子宫内膜患者冻融胚胎移植周期妊娠结局的影响

扫码查看
目的 评估富血小板血浆(PRP)与粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在改善薄型子宫内膜患者冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期妊娠结局的临床效果。方法 回顾性分析2020年1月1日至2023年6月30日在我院生殖中心行IVF-FET周期中诊断为薄型子宫内膜的186例患者的临床资料。根据临床干预措施的不同,分为PRP宫腔灌注组(PRP组,105例)和G-CSF宫腔灌注组(G-CSF组,81例),比较两组患者在宫腔灌注前后子宫内膜厚度变化及其IVF助孕结局,包括临床妊娠率、生化妊娠率、持续妊娠率和早期流产率等。同时,按子宫内膜厚度<6。5 mm(重度薄型子宫内膜)和≥6。5 mm(轻度薄型子宫内膜)进行亚组分组,比较各亚组中PRP组和G-CSF组的子宫内膜变化及妊娠结局。结果 宫腔灌注后,PRP组和G-CSF组的子宫内膜厚度增幅分别为25。04%和18。32%,差异具有统计学意义(P=0。003);两组患者的妊娠结局比较均无统计学差异(P>0。05)。亚组分析结果显示,在重度薄型子宫内膜患者中,PRP亚组的内膜厚度增幅显著高于G-CSF组(31。23%vs。22。34%,P=0。009),其妊娠结局比较均无统计学差异(P>0。05);在轻度薄型子宫内膜患者中,PRP亚组的内膜厚度增幅仍显著高于G-CSF组(19。52%vs。13。11%,P=0。033),其妊娠结局比较均无统计学差异(P>0。05)。结论 PRP与G-CSF宫腔灌注均能有效改善薄型子宫内膜患者的FET周期妊娠结局,其中PRP在增加子宫内膜厚度方面表现更佳,表明PRP宫腔灌注是一种有效的治疗选项。
The effects of different intrauterine infusion treatments on pregnancy outcomes of patients with thin endometrium during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
Objective:To compare the clinical outcomes of platelet-rich plasma(PRP)and Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF))in patients with thin endometrium undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer(FET).Methods:A retrospective analysis of 186 patients with thin endometrium undergoing IVF-FET in Reproductive Center of Beijing Amcare Beisanhuan Women & children's Hospital from January 1,2020 to June 30,2023 was conducted.Patients were divided into PRP group(105 cases)and G-CSF(81 cases)group according to different clinical intervention with intrauterine infusion.Comparisons were conducted on the changes of endometrial thickness before and after infusion,and pregnancy outcomes including clinical pregnancy rate,biochemical pregnancy rate,ongoing pregnancy rate,early miscarriage rate.Then the patients in each group were divided into two subgroups as severe thin endometrium group and mild thin endometrium group with endometrial thickness of 6.5 mm as the boundary.The changes of endometrial thickness before and after infusion as well as pregnancy outcomes were compared.Results:The average increase of endometrial thickness before and after infusion was 25.04%in PRP group and 18.32%in G-CSF group respectively with significant differences(P=0.003).No significant differences were found in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups(P>0.05).In severe thin endometrium group,the increase of endometrial thickness in PRP group was significantly higher than that in G-CSF group(31.23%vs.22.34%,P=0.009)while there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups(P>0.05).In mild thin endometrium group,the increase of endometrial thickness in PRP group was still significantly higher than that in G-CSF group(19.52%vs.13.11%,P=0.033)and no significant differences were found in pregnancy outcomes(P>0.05).Conclusions:Both PRP and G-CSF intrauterine infusion can effectively improve the pregnancy outcomes of FET cycles in patients with thin endometrium,with PRP showing better performance in increasing endometrial thickness,indicating that PRP intrauterine infusion is an effective treatment.

Thin EndometriumIntrauterine InfusionPlatelet-rich plasmaGranulocyte colony-stimulating factor

王蕾、赵红翠、徐阳、吴娟、赵爱华、曹福敏、陈新娜

展开 >

北京美中宜和北三环妇儿医院生殖医学中心,北京 100088

薄型子宫内膜 宫腔灌注 富血小板血浆 粒细胞集落刺激因子

2024

生殖医学杂志
北京协和医院 国家人口计生委科学技术研究所

生殖医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.24
ISSN:1004-3845
年,卷(期):2024.33(12)