首页|铁路深基坑格构桁架支撑替代钢换撑模拟分析与工程实践

铁路深基坑格构桁架支撑替代钢换撑模拟分析与工程实践

扫码查看
依托京滨城际铁路天津机场1号隧道进口明挖深基坑工程,提出用新型格构桁架支撑替代传统钢换撑的优化方案,通过数值模拟对比分析两种方案(传统钢换撑、格构桁架支撑)施工力学响应差异,并在工程中验证了优化方案的安全性与合理性.结果表明:与钢换撑相比,格构桁架支撑方案无需在侧墙预埋配件,可避免墙面修补及预压损伤导致的结构渗漏问题,同时更利于后期拆除;尽管格构桁架支撑强度及刚度弱于钢换撑,但桩墙侧移、地表沉降和内支撑受力变形并未超限,安全系数均大于2.0.通过工程实践,验证了格构桁架支撑的安全性,可在类似工程推广应用.
Numerical Simulation and Engineering Practice on Steel Support Replacement with Lattice Truss in Deep Railway Foundation Pit
Based on the deep foundation pit project at the entrance of Tianjin Airport Tunnel No.1 on the Beijing-Binhai Intercity Railway,an optimized scheme of traditional steel support replacement with a new type of lattice truss support was proposed.The differences in construction mechanical response between the two conditions were compared and analyzed through numerical research.The engineering application was carried out to verify the rationality of the optimized scheme.The results show that,compared with steel support,the lattice truss scheme does not require side wall embedded parts,which can avoid leakage problems caused by wall repair and preloading damage,and is more conducive to later demolition.Although the strength and stiffness of the lattice truss are weaker than those of the steel support,the lateral displacement,surface settlement and internal support force do not exceed the allowable limitation,and the safety factors are all above 2.0.Through engineering practice,it has been verified that using lattice truss is safe and feasible,which can not only significantly reduce the construction period but also save cost.

deep foundation pitsteel support replacementlattice trussnumerical simulationfield monitoring

李然、王圣涛、申志军、邓能伟、李云仙、邓稀肥

展开 >

中铁四局集团有限公司,合肥 230023

北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京 100044

深基坑 钢换撑 格构桁架 数值模拟 现场实测

2024

铁道建筑
中国铁道科学研究院

铁道建筑

北大核心
影响因子:0.623
ISSN:1003-1995
年,卷(期):2024.64(11)