首页|时机理论框架下授权赋能教育对急性心肌梗死介入术后应对方式及自我管理能力的影响

时机理论框架下授权赋能教育对急性心肌梗死介入术后应对方式及自我管理能力的影响

The effect of empowerment education on coping style and self-management ability after acute myocardial infarction intervention under the framework of timing theory

扫码查看
目的:探索时机理论框架下授权赋能教育对急性心肌梗死(AMI)介入术后应对方式及自我管理能力的影响.方法:应用便利抽样法纳入本院2022 年8 月至2023 年7 月接受经皮冠状动脉介入术(PCI)治疗的AMI患者124 例,依据入院时间顺序分为研究组(62 例)和参照组(62 例).参照组给予常规护理干预,研究组给予时机理论框架下授权赋能教育,两组均干预3 个月.比较两组干预前后医学应对方式问卷(MCMQ)、冠心病自我管理量表(CSMS)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)等评分.结果:研究组干预后回避、屈服维度评分低于参照组(t =8.149、9.857,均P<0.001),面对维度评分高于参照组(t =7.555,P<0.001),差异具有统计学意义;两组干预前后MCMQ各维度评分差值差异具有统计学意义(t =9.621、10.707、15.060,均P<0.001);研究组干预后情绪认知管理、治疗依从性管理、疾病知识获得管理、症状管理、一般生活管理与不良嗜好管理维度评分及总分均较参照组高,差异具有统计学意义(t = 5.240、6.521、5.385、2.033、7.524、8.839、11.401,均P<0.05);两组干预前后情绪认知管理、治疗依从性管理、疾病知识获得管理、症状管理、一般生活管理与不良嗜好管理维度评分及总分的差值差异具有统计学意义(t =25.656、14.551、12.207、5.195、18.240、24.311、24.664,均P<0.001);研究组干预后健康状况视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)、健康描述系统(EQ-5D-3L)效用值评分均较参照组高,差异具有统计学意义(t =6.879、6.407,均P<0.001),研究组EQ-VAS、EQ-5D-3L效用值评分干预前后差值大于参照组(t =13.477、14.173,均P<0.001).结论:应用时机理论框架下授权赋能教育可改善AMI患者PCI术后应对方式及自我管理能力,利于提升生活质量.
Objective:To explore the effect of empowerment education on coping style and self-management ability after acute myocardial infarction(AMI)intervention under the framework of timing theory.Methods:A total of 124 patients with AMI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)in our hospital from August 2022 to July 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method.According to the order of admission time,they were divided into study group(62 cases)and reference group(62 cases).The reference group was given routine nursing intervention,and the study group was given empowerment education under the framework of timing theory.Both groups were intervened for 3 months.The scores of Medical Coping Style Questionnaire(MCMQ),Coronary Heart Disease Self-Management Scale(CSMS)and European Five-Dimensional Health Scale(EQ-5D)were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention.Results:After intervention,the scores of avoidance and yield dimensions of the study group were lower than those of the reference group,and the scores of the face dimension were higher than those of the reference group,the differences were statistically significant(t =8.149,9.857,7.555,all P<0.001).There were significant differences in the scores of each dimension of MCMQ between the study group and the reference group before and after intervention(t =9.621,10.707,15.060,all P<0.001).The scores of emotional cognition management,treatment compliance management,disease knowledge acquisition management,symptoms management,general life management and bad habits management,and total scores of study group were higher than those of the reference group,and the differences were statistically significant(t =5.240,6.521,5.385,2.033,7.524,8.839,11.401,all P<0.05).There were statistically significant differences in the scores of emotional cognition management,treatment compliance management,disease knowledge acquisition management,symptoms management,general life management and bad habits management dimensions and total scores in the CSMS scale before and after intervention in the study group and the reference group(t = 25.656,14.551,12.207,5.195,18.240,24.311,24.664,all P<0.001).The post-intervention health status visual analog scale(EQ-VAS)and EQ-5D-3L utility value score of the study group were higher than those of the reference group(t =6.879,6.407,all P<0.001),and the pre-and post-intervention differences in EQ-VAS and EQ-5D-3L utility scores of the study group were greater than those of the reference group(t =13.477,14.173,all P<0.001).Conclusion:The application of empowerment education under the framework of timing theory can improve the coping style and self-management ability of patients with AMI after PCI,which is beneficial to improve the quality of life.

timing theoryempowerment educationacute myocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary interventioncoping styleself-management ability

袁志婷、贡欢欢、于雨、王琴

展开 >

南京医科大学第一附属医院 心血管内科,江苏 南京 210029

时机理论 授权赋能教育 急性心肌梗死 经皮冠状动脉介入术 应对方式 自我管理能力

2024

现代医学
东南大学

现代医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.703
ISSN:1671-7562
年,卷(期):2024.52(3)
  • 20