土工基础2024,Vol.38Issue(2) :310-312.

回填材料含水率检测美标与国标方法对比研究

Comparative Study of American and Chinese Code Methods for Determining the Moisture Content of Backfill Materials

谷立强 孟庆飞 刘朋 刘庆宇 王亮
土工基础2024,Vol.38Issue(2) :310-312.

回填材料含水率检测美标与国标方法对比研究

Comparative Study of American and Chinese Code Methods for Determining the Moisture Content of Backfill Materials

谷立强 1孟庆飞 1刘朋 1刘庆宇 1王亮1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 河北双诚建筑工程检测有限公司,石家庄 050031
  • 折叠

摘要

由于地基的稳定性对上层建筑的影响非常大,所以无论是路基路面,还是厂区回填,压实度的检测至关重要,而压实度又与回填材料的最大干密度、湿密度、含水率有关,其中湿密度和含水率必须根据现场的取样得出.针对回填材料的含水率检测,国内常用的方法是烘干法,国外常用的方法是快速含水率检测法.两种方法都可以检测回填材料的含水率,也各有优缺点.现针对两种检测方法进行了试验结果分析对比研究,所得结论可供有关方参考.

Abstract

The degree of compaction testing is critical for both the roadway subgrade and the factory backfills since the stability of the foundation soils has a significant impact on the superstructure.The compactness is closely related to the maximum dry density,the wet density and the moisture content of backfill materials,among which the wet density and moisture content are obtained based on the on-site sampling.For moisture content determination of backfill materials,oven dry method is commonly used in China,and the rapid moisture content determination method is usually allowed abroad.Both two methods can determine the moisture content of backfill materials,and each has its own advantages and disadvantages.This paper analyzes and com-pares the test results of both methods.

关键词

烘干法/快速含水率检测法/含水率

Key words

Oven Dry Method/Rapid Moisture Content Determining Method/Moisture Content

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
土工基础
湖北省土木建筑学会,中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,武汉市土木建筑学会

土工基础

影响因子:0.238
ISSN:1004-3152
参考文献量5
段落导航相关论文