首页|环境民事公益诉讼中初步证明界定及证明标准设置研究

环境民事公益诉讼中初步证明界定及证明标准设置研究

扫码查看
2020年最高人民法院《关于审理环境民事公益诉讼案件适用法律若干问题的解释》中首次提出了"初步证明",对之界定及其与"因果关系""关联性"间关系的辨析是当事人责任承担中的重要问题。以证明责任分配的"规范说"为逻辑起点,可推导出诉讼双方应分别承担因果关系证成与证否的证明责任;将环境侵权与环境公益诉讼并行分析,可将"初步证明"解释为环境民事公益诉讼中"行为与损害结果之间存在因果关系"的证明标准,其证明程度应略高于但不突破"关联性"标准。
The Definition of Preliminary Proof and the Setting of Proof Standards in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation
In 2020,the Supreme People's Court put forward"preliminary proof"for the first time in the"Interpretation of several issues on the Application of Law to hearing environmental civil public interest litigation cases".The definition of"preliminary proof"and the relationship between the"causation"and"relevance"are important issues in the responsibility of the parties.Taking the"Norm Theory"of burden of proof as the logical starting point,it is deduced that both parties in litigation should respectively bear the burden of proof of the existence and non-existence of causation.By analyzing environmental tort and environmental public interest litigation in parallel,"preliminary proof"can be interpreted as the proof standard of"causal relationship between behavior and damage result"in environmental civil public interest litigation,and the degree of proof should be slightly higher than but not break through the"relevance"standard.

preliminary proofrelevancecausationenvironmental civil public interest litigation

李清宇、单鑫语

展开 >

兰州大学法学院,甘肃 兰州 730000

初步证明 关联性 因果关系 环境民事公益诉讼

2024

天津法学
天津市政法管理干部学院 天津市法学会

天津法学

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.346
ISSN:1674-828X
年,卷(期):2024.40(3)