首页|从"摆平"到"规则之治":社会矛盾纠纷治理的制度化转向与嵌入性审视

从"摆平"到"规则之治":社会矛盾纠纷治理的制度化转向与嵌入性审视

扫码查看
制度化本质上是规则之治,实现制度化治理是当下我国推动社会治理现代化的重要议题.对于社会矛盾纠纷治理的制度化转向,现有研究尚侧重于整体、宏观向的考察,既缺少对制度化转向具体表现形态的梳理,也忽视了制度化转向在宏观制度环境中的嵌入性问题.X市A区矛调中心的治理实践在"结构—机制—行动"三个维度呈现了社会矛盾纠纷治理的制度化转向,具体表现为治理结构的一体化、治理机制的程序化与治理行动的规范化.从制度嵌入性的视角来看,这一制度化转向受到群众路线、政治压力与监督问责等宏观制度环境的影响,须不断调适优化.这表明,对社会矛盾纠纷治理的制度化转向的关注不应仅停留在制度建构这一层面,还应当将注意力适时放在影响制度存续与绩效产生的宏观制度环境上.
From"Brutal Enforcement"to"Rule of Law":Institutional Transition and Embedded Examination in the Governance of Social Contradictions and Disputes
Achieving institutionalized governance is a crucial task in advancing social governance modernization in China.Existing research on the institutional shift in managing social contradic-tions and disputes remains insufficient.The governance practices of the mediation center in District A,City X,demonstrate an institutional shift in managing social contradictions and disputes across three dimensions:structure integration,mechanism proceduralization,and action standardization.From the perspective of institutional embeddedness,this shift is influenced by the mass line,politi-cal pressure,and accountability mechanisms within the macro-institutional environment.This highlights that the focus on institutionalizing social contradictions and disputes governance should go beyond institutional construction to include the broader institutional context that affects sustain-ability and performance.

governance of contradictions and disputesthe mediation center"Feng Qiao"experi-encesocial governance

庞尚尚

展开 >

南开大学,天津 300350

矛盾纠纷治理 矛调中心 枫桥经验 社会治理

2025

天津行政学院学报
天津行政学院

天津行政学院学报

北大核心
影响因子:0.508
ISSN:1008-7168
年,卷(期):2025.27(1)