首页|构建出血性卒中不良预后的风险预测模型:一项横断面研究

构建出血性卒中不良预后的风险预测模型:一项横断面研究

扫码查看
目的 研究出血性卒中的不良预后因素,并构建预测模型,改进相关评判体系。方法 从院前-院内一体化角度开展横断面调查,经单因素比较后,将有显著差异的指标依次纳入单因素-多因素Poisson回归分析,将筛选所得独立危险因素构建为预测模型。再以列线图形式将预测模型转为可视化的优化评分量表,获知相应评分对应的预测概率。应用ROC曲线检验优化评分与ICH-CT评分对于预测不良预后的评判效能,按照两种评分信息提取验证组患者的相关资料,获取每例验证组患者的最终评分。将评分与预后结果代入ROC曲线以评价不同预测模型的预测能力,并将预测模型转换为可视化的优化评分量表,从而量化不良预后转归的概率;再以ICH-CT模型为参照,探寻优化评分对于出血性卒中患者不良预后转归的评判效能。结果 经过样本量计算,最终选取273例患者作为本次横断面研究的模型组样本:累计110例出血性卒中患者为不良预后转归、163例患者预后尚可,时间跨度为2021年1月至2021年9月。另收集2021年9月至2022年1月期间81例急性出血性卒中患者为验证组:出血性卒中患者预后不良及尚可的患者分别为21、60例。模型组不同预后组间比较人口学特征发现:男性占比、年龄、糖尿病病史存在显著统计学差异(均P<0。05);其他临床资料组间比较发现GCS评分、就诊时间、出血血肿量、发热、混合征、脑疝、脑室内出血发生率及出血部位存在显著统计学差异(均P<0。05)。回归分析发现,糖尿病病程、就诊时间、出血血肿量、混合征、脑室内出血为不良预后的影响因素。优化评分与ICH-CT评分的评判临界(Cut-off)值分别为186分、128分,优化评分的AUC与Youden指数均大于ICH-CT评分,优化评分对于不良预后的评判效能优于ICH-CT评分(Z=2。369,P<0。05)。结论 本研究为出血性卒中患者的不良预后构建了预测模型,并将其转化为易于临床使用的优化评分。其预测效能优于传统评估方式。
Construction of Risk Prediction Model for Poor Prognosis among Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients:A Cross-sectional Study
Objective To study the predictive factors for a poor prognosis of hemorrhagic stroke,build a prediction model,and improve the current evaluation system.Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted from the perspective of pre-hospi-tal and intra-hospital integration.After single factor comparison,indicators with significant differences were sequentially includ-ed in univariant and multivariant Poisson regression analysis.The selected independent risk factors were constructed as predic-tive models.The prediction model was converted into a visual optimization rating scale in the form of a column chart to obtain the corresponding prediction probability for the corresponding rating.The ROC curve was used to test the effectiveness of opti-mizing scores and ICH-CT scores in predicting poor prognosis.Relevant data of patients in the validation group were extracted based on the two scoring information,and the final score of each validation group patient was obtained.The scoring and prog-nostic results were substituted into the ROC curve to evaluate the predictive ability of different prediction models,and the pre-diction models were converted into visual optimization scoring scales to quantify the probability of adverse prognosis outcomes.The ICH-CT model was used as a reference to explore the effectiveness of optimizing scoring in evaluating poor prognosis out-comes in patients with hemorrhagic stroke.Results After sample size calculation,273 patients were ultimately selected as the model group for this cross-sectional study:a total of 110 hemorrhagic stroke patients had poor prognosis,163 patients had a good prognosis,and the time span was from January 2021 to September 2021.Another 81 patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke between September 2021 and January 2022 were collected as the validation group:21 patients with poor prognosis and 60 patients with acceptable prognosis were included in the hemorrhagic stroke group.The demographic characteristics of the valida-tion group were compared,and significant statistical differences were observed in the proportion of men,age,and history of dia-betes(P<0.05),Comparison of other clinical data between groups showed significant statistical differences(P<0.05)in GCS score,visit time,amount of bleeding and hematoma,mixed sign,cerebral hernia,and intraventricular hemorrhage.The cut-off values for the optimization score and ICH-CT score were 186 and 128,respectively.The AUC and Youden indices of the optimi-zation score were both higher than those of the ICH-CT score.The evaluation efficiency of the optimization score for adverse prognosis was better than that of the ICH-CT score(Z=2.369,P<0.05).Conclusion A predictive model for poor prognosis in patients with hemorrhagic stroke was constructed in this study,and it was converted it into an optimized score that has strong feasibility in clinical practice.

hemorrhagic strokeprognosispredictive modelcross-sectional study

柳新胜、江旺祥

展开 >

武汉市急救中心,武汉 430022

出血性卒中 预后 预测模型 横断面研究

武汉市医学科研重点项目

WX18A12

2024

华中科技大学学报(医学版)
华中科技大学

华中科技大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.443
ISSN:1672-0741
年,卷(期):2024.53(3)