首页|外周神经阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉在成人腹股沟疝修补术中麻醉效果的比较

外周神经阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉在成人腹股沟疝修补术中麻醉效果的比较

扫码查看
目的 比较髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经(IIIHN)联合生殖股神经生殖支(GBGF)阻滞与腰硬联合麻醉(CSEA)用于开放性成人单侧腹股沟斜疝手术的麻醉效果。方法 选择择期腹股沟斜疝行开放性单侧无张力疝修补术患者90例,采用随机数字表法分为Ⅰ组(试验组)和C组(对照组)2组,每组45例。I组在超声引导下行IIIHN联合GBGF阻滞;C组采用CSEA。评价两种麻醉感觉阻滞程度和运动阻滞效果;比较两组患者麻醉前、麻醉后5 min、手术开始切皮时、开始牵拉精索/圆韧带时、疝囊高位结扎时的心率和平均动脉压;评价术中补救镇痛和血管活性药的用药情况;比较两种麻醉术后静息VAS评分及术后镇痛泵的按压次数。结果 两组患者感觉阻滞程度均为有效阻滞(P>0。05);Ⅰ组患者44例运动阻滞程度0级,C组双侧下肢运动阻滞均达2级以上(P<0。05);在麻醉5 min后,C组部分患者的心率有升高伴平均动脉压下降(均P<0。05);两组患者中,I组未使用血管活性药物,C组有6例患者使用了甲氧明(P<0。05);1组患者在术后6、12 h的VAS评分和术后镇痛泵按压次数均低于C组(均P<0。05)。结论 IIIHN联合GBGF阻滞用于成人开放性单侧腹股沟斜疝修补术,在感觉阻滞程度和麻醉效果评级方面达到了CSEA的效果,其较CSEA对全身的影响更小。
Comparison of Peripheral Nerve Block and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Anesthetic Efficacy in Adult Inguinal Hernia Repair
Objective To evaluate and compare the anesthesia efficacy of ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block in conjunc-tion with the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve block and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in adult patients undergo-ing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery.Methods Ninety patients with indirect inguinal hernias,scheduled for unilateral tension-free herniorrhaphy,were randomly allocated to either an ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve combined with the genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve block(Group Ⅰ,n=45)or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia(Group C,n=45).The sensory block of the skin area and motor function of the lower limbs were assessed.Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were compared between the two groups before anesthesia,5 min after anesthesia,at beginning of skin incision,during stretching of the spermatic cord/round ligament,and during high ligation of the hernia sac.The need for sufentanil,additional local anesthet-ics,and the use of blood pressure medications were also evaluated.Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS)scores at rest and the number of patient-controlled analgesia compressions were compared between the two groups.Results Both groups demon-strated effective sensory block of the skin area(both P>0.05).However,there was a significant difference in motor block of the lower limbs between the groups.In Group Ⅰ,44 patients exhibited no motor block,whereas in Group C,a bilateral lower limb motor block of grade 2 or higher was observed(P<0.05).Five minutes after anesthesia,some patients in Group C showed an increased heart rate along with a decreased mean arterial pressure,suggesting a potential adverse effect of the intervention(P<0.05).Additionally,vasoactive drug(methoxamine)was used in 6 patients in Group C,which was not used in group I(P<0.05).The VAS scores and the number of analgesic pump presses at 6 and 12 hours post-surgery were significantly lower in Group I compared to Group C(both P<0.05).Conclusion The combined ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block with the gen-ital branch of the genitofemoral nerve block is as effective as combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for achieving sensory nerve block and anesthesia in adult patients undergoing open unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy,with less systemic impact compared to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

adult inguinal hernia surgeryilioinguinal nerve blockiliohypogastric nerve blockgenital branch of gen-itofemoral nerve blockcombined spinal-epidural anesthesia

黄志、彭晓红、邱艳、杨梦思

展开 >

武汉市第四医院麻醉科,武汉 430033

成人腹股沟疝手术 髂腹股沟神经阻滞 髂腹下神经阻滞 生殖股神经生殖支阻滞 腰硬联合麻醉

2024

华中科技大学学报(医学版)
华中科技大学

华中科技大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.443
ISSN:1672-0741
年,卷(期):2024.53(6)