首页|参芪扶正注射液辅助治疗胃癌化疗后癌因性疲乏患者效果观察

参芪扶正注射液辅助治疗胃癌化疗后癌因性疲乏患者效果观察

扫码查看
目的:探讨参芪扶正注射液辅助治疗胃癌化疗后癌因性疲乏(CRF)患者效果观察及对免疫功能和生存质量的影响.方法:选自本院于 2021 年3 月—2022年10月胃癌化疗后CRF患者 110例,依据随机表法分为观察组 55 例与对照组55例.对照组患者静脉滴注甘露聚糖肽10 mg/次,1次/d;观察组患者在对照组基础上静脉滴注参芪扶正注射液 250 ml/次,1 次/d.两组治疗周期4 周.比较两组治疗前后Piper疲乏修订量表(PFS-R)评分、简易疲乏量表(BFI)和Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)评分、免疫功能、肿瘤标志物及欧洲生活质量协作组癌症核心量表(QLQ-C30)评分变化.结果:两组治疗前认知、感觉、情感、行为和整体疲乏度评分比较无显著差异(P>0.05);两组治疗后认知、感觉、情感、行为和整体疲乏度评分低于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组治疗后认知、感觉、情感、行为和整体疲乏度评分低于对照组(P<0.05).两组治疗前BFI量表和GCQ量表评分比较无显著差异(P>0.05);两组治疗后BFI量表评分低于治疗前,而GCQ量表评分高于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组治疗后BFI量表评分低于对照组,而GCQ量表评分高于对照组(P<0.05).两组治疗前CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/CD8+比较无显著差异(P>0.05);两组治疗后CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/CD8+高于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组治疗后CD3+、CD4+和CD4+/CD8+高于对照组(P<0.05).两组治疗前CEA和CA-724水平比较无显著差异(P>0.05);两组治疗后CEA和CA-724 水平低于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组治疗后CEA和CA-724 水平低于对照组(P<0.05).两组治疗前躯体功能、角色功能、社会功能、认知功能和情感功能评分比较无显著差异(P>0.05);两组治疗后躯体功能、角色功能、社会功能、认知功能和情感功能评分高于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组治疗后躯体功能、角色功能、社会功能、认知功能和情感功能评分高于对照组(P<0.05).结论:参芪扶正注射液辅助治疗胃癌化疗后CRF患者治疗效果显著,可显著改善患者疲乏症状,显著改善患者免疫功能,显著改善患者生存质量.
Observation on the effect of Shenqi Fuzheng injection as an adjuvant treatment for cancer related fatigue patients after chemotherapy for gastric cancer
Objective:To explore the efficacy of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection as an adjuvant therapy for patients with cancer-related fatigue(CRF)after chemotherapy for gastric cancer and its impact on immune function and quality of life.Methods:110 patients with CRF after chemotherapy for gastric cancer were selected from our hospital from March 2021 to October 2022,and were divided into 55 cases in the observation group and 55 cases in the control group according to the method of randomized table.In the control group,10 mg mannan peptide was injected intravenously once per day.In the observation group,patients received intravenous infusion of 250 ml/time of Shenqi Fuzheng injection based on the control group,once a day.The treatment cycle in both groups lasted for 4 weeks.Piper Fatigue Scale-Revised(PFS-R),Brief Fatigue Inventory(BFI),and Kolcaba Comfort Scale(GCQ)scores,immune function,tumor markers,and the European Collaborative Group on Quality-of-Life Cancer Score(QLQ-C30)before and after treatment were compared between the two groups.Results:There were no significant differences in the cognitive,sensory,emotional,behavioral,and overall fatigue scores between the two groups of CRF patients before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the cognitive,sensory,emotional,behavioral,and total scores of CRF patients in both groups were lower than before treatment(P<0.05),and these indices were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the BFI and GCQ scores between the two groups of patients with CRF before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the BFI scores of CRF patients in both groups were lower before treatment,while the GCQ scores were higher than those before treatment(P<0.05).The BFI scores of CRF patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,while the GCQ scores were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There were no significant differences in CD3+,CD4+,and CD4+/CD8+ levels between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the levels of CD3+,CD4+,and CD4+/CD8+ in CRF patients in both groups were higher than those before treatment(P<0.05),and these indices were higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in CEA and CA-724 levels between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the levels of CEA and CA-724 in both groups were lower than before treatment(P<0.05),and these two indices were lower in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the physical function,role function,social function,cognitive function,and emotional function scores between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the physical function,role function,social function,cognitive function,and emotional function scores of CRF patients in both groups were higher than before treatment(P<0.05),and the scores of these functions were higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusions:The therapeutic effect of Shenqi Fuzheng Injection in the adjuvant treatment of patients with CRF after chemotherapy for gastric cancer is remarkable,which can significantly improve the fatigue symptoms,significantly improve the immune function,and significantly improve the quality of survival of patients.

Shenqi Fuzheng injectiongastric cancerchemotherapycancer induced fatigueimmunityquality of life

黎智燊、张芸、史清华

展开 >

广东省第二中医院,广东 510095

参芪扶正注射液 胃癌 化疗 癌因性疲乏 免疫功能 生存质量

2024

天津药学
天津市医药集团有限公司 天津市药学会

天津药学

影响因子:0.794
ISSN:1006-5687
年,卷(期):2024.36(1)
  • 20