首页|艾司西酞普兰联合利培酮及脑电生物反馈治疗精神分裂症临床观察

艾司西酞普兰联合利培酮及脑电生物反馈治疗精神分裂症临床观察

扫码查看
目的:探讨艾司西酞普兰联合利培酮辅助脑电生物反馈治疗在精神分裂症(SCH)患者中的应用价值.方法:选取100例本院2021年8月—2023年8月收治的SCH患者,按随机数字表法分为两组(各50例).对照组口服艾司西酞普兰联合利培酮治疗:西酞普兰初始剂量为5 mg/d,2周内增至15 mg/d,均1次/d;利培酮初始剂量1 mg/d,1次/d,2周内增至4~6 mg/d,2次/d.观察组加用脑电生物反馈治疗:将脑电生物反馈仪的配套电极按要求粘贴好,之后启动仪器,获取患者脑电波,并进行相应分析,依据情况调整θ波、β波,并以耐受调节肌电值,使θ波控制在4~8 Hz,β波控制在15~20 Hz,30 min/次;持续8周.比较两组治疗效果及安全性.结果:观察组总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组治疗前疾病症状比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后阴性和阳性症状量表(PANSS)评分低于治疗前,且观察组治疗后PANSS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组治疗前认知功能和社会功能比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后简易精神量表(MMSE)和住院精神患者社会功能评定量表(SSPI)评分高于治疗前,且观察组治疗后MMSE和SSPI评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组治疗前生活质量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组治疗后SF-36评分高于治疗前,且观察组治疗后SF-36评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组不良反应比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:脑电生物反馈治疗联用艾司西酞普兰、利培酮可提高SCH患者疗效,加快疾病症状消失,减轻认知及社会功能损害,安全可行.
Clinical observation of escitalopram combined with risperidone and EEG biofeedback in the treatment of schizophrenia
Objective:To explore the application value of escitalopram combined with risperidone-assisted electroencephalogram(EEG)biofeedback therapy in patients with schizophrenia(SCH).Methods:One hundred patients with SCH admitted to our hospital between August 2021 and August 2023 were selected and randomly divided into two groups(50 cases each)using a random number table method.The control group was treated with oral escitalopram combined with risperidone,and the initial dose of escitalopram was 5 mg/day,which was increased to 15 mg/d within two weeks,once a day.The initial dose of risperidone was 1 mg/day,once a day,which was increased to 4~6 mg/d,twice a day,within 2 weeks.In the observation group,the EEG biofeedback treatment was added,and the supporting electrodes of the EEG biofeedback instrument were affixed according to the requirements.The instrument was then used to obtain the patients'brainwaves and conduct a corresponding analysis.The θ and β waves were adjusted according to the situation,and the EMG value was adjusted according to tolerance so that the θ waves were controlled at 4~8 Hz and the β wave at 15~20 Hz for 30 min.The two groups were treated for eight weeks,and the efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared.Results:The total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the disease symptoms between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the PANSS scores of both groups were lower than before treatment,and the PANSS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in cognitive and social functions between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the MMSE and SSPI scores of both groups were higher than before treatment,and the MMSE and SSPI scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in quality of life between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the SF-36 scores of both groups were higher than before treatment,and the SF-36 scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).There were no statistically significant differences in adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:The combination of EEG biofeedback therapy with escitalopram and risperidone improved the efficacy of SCH,accelerated the disappearance of disease symptoms,alleviated cognitive and social function impairment,and was safe and feasible.

schizophreniaescitalopramrisperidoneEEG biofeedbackcognitive function

陈海冰、熊丹、汤秀成、洪恩荣

展开 >

九江市第五人民医院,江西 332000

精神分裂症 艾司西酞普兰 利培酮 脑电生物反馈 认知功能

2024

天津药学
天津市医药集团有限公司 天津市药学会

天津药学

影响因子:0.794
ISSN:1006-5687
年,卷(期):2024.36(4)