首页|"发展有效性"议程衰退的历程及内因

"发展有效性"议程衰退的历程及内因

扫码查看
21世纪以来,由于传统国际发展援助的疲态及南南合作的兴起,发达国家官方发展援助的认可度和权威性下降.为提升其发展援助的合法性,发达国家开始在其主导的框架内对国际发展治理体系进行改革.2011年釜山会议上,发达国家推动了"发展有效性"议程,随后创建了"全球有效发展合作伙伴关系"(GPEDC)机制."发展有效性"议程延续了"援助有效性"部分规范,旨在吸纳新兴援助国和非国家行为体,并协调南南合作范式.为适应利益相关者不断变化的需求,"全球有效发展合作伙伴关系"在2022年日内瓦峰会上推出了有效性监测框架3.0.但由于传统援助国与新兴国家对"政治认同"和"责任划分"问题存在争议,"发展有效性"在推进过程中遭遇了重大挫折.一方面,传统援助国无视南南合作与南北援助的本质不同,对新兴援助国提出了过高监测标准,导致新兴国家退出了"全球有效发展合作伙伴关系".另一方面,传统援助者在对"发展有效性"规范进行政策调整的过程中,背离了其原先的"援助有效性"承诺,降低了援助标准,并意图淡化其自身责任.引发这些问题的内因在于"全球有效发展合作伙伴关系"存在的结构性缺陷,一是传统援助者未真正与新兴援助国实现分权,二是"全球有效发展合作伙伴关系"参与主体间利益与愿景各异,难以达成有效的合作.
The Process and Internal Causes of the Decline of the Development Effectiveness Agenda
Since the 21st century,due to the fatigue of traditional international development assistance and the rise of South-South cooperation,the recognition and authority of official development assistance from de-veloped countries have declined.In order to enhance the legitimacy of their development aid,developed coun-tries have begun to reform the international development governance system within their dominant frameworks.At the Busan Conference in 2011,developed countries promoted the agenda on"Development Effectiveness"and subsequently created the Global Partnership for Development Co-operation(GPEDC).This agenda con-tinues some of the norms of Aid Effectiveness and aims to absorb emerging donors and non-state actors and co-ordinate the South-South cooperation paradigm.In order to adapt to the changing needs of stakeholders,the GPEDC launched the Effectiveness Monitoring Framework 3.0 at the 2022 Geneva Summit.However,due to the disputes between traditional donors and emerging countries over political identity and division of responsi-bilities,the concept of Development Effectiveness has suffered a major setback in the process of advance-ment.On the one hand,traditional donors ignored the essential differences between South-South cooperation and North-South aid,and put forward overly high monitoring standards for emerging donors,resulting in e-merging countries withdrawing from the GPEDC.On the other hand,in the process of adjusting policies to the norm of development effectiveness,traditional donors have deviated from their original commitments on aid effectiveness,lowered aid standards,and attempted to downplay their own responsibilities.The funda-mental reason for these challenges lies in the structural defects of the GPEDC.First,traditional donors have not truly achieved decentralization with emerging donors.Second,the interests and visions of the GPEDC participants are various,making it difficult to achieve effective cooperation.

international development governanceaid effectivenessdevelopment effectivenessGlobal Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation

黄梅波、应玲蓉

展开 >

上海对外经贸大学,上海 200336

国际发展治理 "援助有效性" "发展有效性" "全球有效发展合作伙伴关系"

2024

太平洋学报
中国太平洋学会

太平洋学报

CSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.608
ISSN:1004-8049
年,卷(期):2024.32(11)