首页|三种用标准贯入判别地震液化方法的效果分析

三种用标准贯入判别地震液化方法的效果分析

扫码查看
场地饱和砂土液化是工程中普遍存在的不良地质作用,海外工程项目业主多要求采用美国或欧盟标准规范判别地震液化,与中国相关标准规范推荐做法有很大区别.根据标准贯入测试结果,采用NCEER法、Boulanger-Idriss 2014 法和抗震规范法,对国内外已发生的230 个地震实例的液化判别效果进行分析讨论.结果显示,三种方法的结果基本符合实际,Boulanger-Idriss 2014 法成功率最高,抗震规范法最简便且最保守.建议海外项目可采用NCEER法和Boulanger-Idriss 2014 法,国内项目可采用抗震规范法.分析结果可为标准贯入判别地震液化评估提供参考.
Analysis on the effect of three earthquake-induced liquefaction triggering procedures using Standard Penetration Test
Liquefaction of saturated soils on-site is a widespread adverse geological phenomenon encountered in engineering projects.Most overseas project owners mandate adherence to the US or EU standards for assessing soil liquefaction risks.Notably,there are significant differences between the Chinese codes and the US or EU standards in this aspect.Based on the results of Standard Penetration Test(SPT),this study applies three liquefaction triggering procedures-the NCEER Method,Boulanger-Idriss 2014 Method and the method recommended by the Chinese Code for Seismic Design of Buildings to analyse and discuss 230 earthquake cases worldwide.The results show that these methods generally provide reliable assessments that are consistent with reality.Boulanger-Idriss 2014 Method aligns most closely with the actual conditions,whereas the Chinese seismic method is noted for its simplicity,easy of use,and conservative nature.For overseas projects,Boulanger-Idriss 2014 Method and NCEER Method are recommended,while the Chinese seismic code method is deemed suitable for domestic projects.The results provide valuable reference for earthquake-induced liquefaction assessment using Standard Penetration Test.

Earthquake-induced liquefaction triggering proceduresStandard Penetration TestNCEER methodBoulanger-Idriss 2014 method

赵拓宇

展开 >

中国石油工程建设有限公司西南分公司,四川 成都 610041

地震液化判别方法 标准贯入测试 NCEER法 Boulanger-Idriss 2014法

2024

天然气与石油
中国石油集团工程设计有限责任公司西南分公司

天然气与石油

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.841
ISSN:1006-5539
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 20