首页|东洞庭湖及其入湖口水域表层沉积物中重金属的分布特征与生态风险

东洞庭湖及其入湖口水域表层沉积物中重金属的分布特征与生态风险

扫码查看
为了解东洞庭湖及其入湖口表层沉积物中TI、Sb等重金属的污染特征,对9个采样断面表层沉积物中TI、Sb、Hg、Cd、As、Pb、Cu、Ni、Co、Cr、V、Mn和Zn等13种重金属的含量、空间分布特征、来源进行了分析,并对其生态风险进行了评价。研究结果表明,沉积物中13种重金属的平均质量分数在0.180~762 mg·kg-1之间,其质量分数大小为Mn>Zn>V>Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>As>Co>Cd>Sb>TI>Hg。湘江(S1)和汨罗江(S2)入湖口以及鹿角(S4)、东洞庭湖(S6)、岳阳楼(S7)和洞庭湖出口(S9)表层沉积物中重金属污染较严重,各重金属具有相同的来源或产生了复合污染。第一主成分(PC1)主要源于湘江和汨罗江来水,湘江起主导作用;V主要源于湖区周边污染。地累积指数评价得出:沉积物中各重金属的污染程度顺序为Cd>Hg>Pb>As=Zn>Sb>V>Cu>Mn>TI>Co>Ni>Cr,整个研究区(Itot=5.74)面临严重污染。潜在生态风险指数(Eri)表明各重金属的生态风险大小为Cd>Hg>Sb>TI>As>Pb>Cu> Ni>Co>V>Cr>Zn>Mn;沉积物中13种重金属的RI值介于217.9~1968之间,平均值为555.1,整个研究区属“重度”生态风险,主要风险污染物为Cd和Hg,其次为TI和 Sb。各采样点的生态风险大小顺序为 S1>S6>S9>S7>S4>S2>S5(扁山)>S8(大小西湖)>S3(新墙河)。研究表明,湘江入湖口(S1)面临“严重”生态风险,鹿角(S4)至洞庭湖出口(S9)水域面临“重度”生态风险,S1、S4、S6、S7和S9已成为了潜在生态风险区域。
Distribution Characteristics and Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediment of East Dongting Lake and Its Lake Inlet
In order to investigate the pollution characteristics of TI, Sb and other heavy metals in surface sediments of East Dongting Lake and its Lake inlet, the concentrations of 13 kinds of heavy metals including TI, Sb, Hg, Cd, As, Pb, Cu, Ni, Co, Cr, V, Mn and Zn in nine sediments sampling sections were analyzed. The spatial distribution, sources and ecological risk of those heavy metal were evaluated. The results indicated that the average concentrations of each heavy metals in the sediment samples ranged from 0.180 mg·kg-1 to 762 mg·kg-1. The contents of each heavy metals were followed by the order: Mn>Zn>V>Cr>Pb>Cu>Ni>As> Co>Cd>Sb>TI>Hg. The pollution extent of sediments collected from S1(Xiangjiang lake inlet), S2(Miluo River), S4(Lujiao), S6(East Dongting Lake), S7(Yueyang Tower) and S9(Dongting LAke exit) were more serious. The sources of most heavy metals in sediments were similar, the first principal components were mainly from Xiangjiang River and Miluojiang River, Xiangjiang River played a leading role. V was mainly from the pollution around the lake. The pollution extent of each heavy metals in sediments by geo-accumulation index (Igeo) followed the order: Cd>Hg>Pb>As=Zn>Sb>V>Cu>Mn>TI>Co>Ni>Cr, and the study area was facing serious pollution. The potential ecological risk of each heavy metals in sediments by the potential ecological risk factor (Eri) were in the following order: Cd>Hg>Sb>TI>As>Pb>Cu>Ni>Co>V>Cr>Zn>Mn; The average potential ecological risk index was 555.1 (ranging from 217.9 to 1968), the study area was facing severe ecological risk, Cd and Hg were the major risk pollutants, followed by TI and Sb. The potential ecological risk of all sampling sites were followed by the order: S1>S6>S9>S7>S4> S2>S5(Bianshan)>S8(West Lake)>S3(Xinqiang River). Xiangjiang lake inlet (S1) was facing serious ecological risk, Lujiao (S4) to Dongting Lake exit (S9) were facing severe ecological risk, S1, S4, S6, S7 and S9 have become potential ecological risk regions.

East Dongting LakeLake inletsedimentheavy metalsecological risk

欧阳美凤、谢意南、李利强、田琪、张屹、张光贵

展开 >

湖南省洞庭湖生态环境监测中心,湖南岳阳 414000

东洞庭湖 入湖口 沉积物 重金属 生态风险

2015年湖南省环境保护科技计划项目

2016

生态环境学报
广东省生态环境与土壤研究所 广东省土壤学会

生态环境学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.608
ISSN:1674-5906
年,卷(期):2016.25(7)
  • 10
  • 14