The Defects and Remedies of Political Meritocracy:Discussion with Daniel A Bell
The controversy surrounding Daniel A.Bell's view on political meritocracy has long passed,and Bell and his co-authors have responded and explained to the academic evaluation,but the lack of legitimacy confirmation and the relationship between meritocracy and democracy have not been ultimately resolved in theory and practice.Recently,Li Dongyang and Bell's paper"Further Discussion on the Political meritocracy"has led the discussion of political meritocracy towards the narrative of ethical relationships,and clearly advocated the integration of meritocracy and democracy while reiterating the multiple narrative of meritocracy and the historical context of the discourse of meritocracy.From the original construction of political meritocracy and the subsequent supplementation and revision of political meritocracy by Bell and other scholars,the legitimacy of political meritocracy and its applicability in different cultural and institutional backgrounds remain the key to whether political meritocracy can be confirmed from theory to practice.
political meritocracymeritocracydemocracyDaniel A.Bella good government
万方数据
