首页|个人信用信息采集:标准明确与告知同意原则之完善

个人信用信息采集:标准明确与告知同意原则之完善

扫码查看
在个人信息保护强化与社会信用体系建设持续推进的大背景下,我国个人信用信息的采集环节仍然存在信息主体、信息与信用关联、信息性质公共与非公共区分、信息敏感性与评估等标准不明确的问题.个人信用信息的主体应确定为自然人,且不应以民事行为能力作为条件限制;在个人信息与信用的关联识别上应采法定与约定义务;以公共利益对信息的公共与非公共性进行区分;敏感性代表了人格利益侵害风险,可结合场景进行综合判断.个人信用信息采集过程还存在告知同意原则无视不同类型信息性质、敏感性差异而统一适用、单一的明示方式过于刚性、告知同意流于形式等问题,可针对公共与非公共、信息的敏感度等因素进行分类适用,并有条件地引入默示同意.
Personal Credit Information Collection:Improvement of Criteria Clarity and Informed Consent Principle
In the context of strengthening personal information protection and social credit system con-struction,in collecting personal credit information in China exist such problems as unclear criteria of in-formation subjects,linkage between information and credit,distinction between public and non-public information,information sensitivity and evaluation,etc.The subject of personal credit information should be the natural person irrespective of his civil capacity.The recognition of linkage between personal infor-mation and credit should adopt legal and contractual obligations.The public and non-public nature of in-formation should be distinguished with public interest as the standard.As sensitivity represents the risk of personality interest infringement,it is advisable to judge comprehensively with consideration of specific situations.In the process of collecting personal credit information exist such problems as uniform applica-tion of the principle of informed consent regardless of difference in information nature and sensitivity,rig-id and single explicit expression mode,and formalistic informed consent.It is advisable to separately ap-ply according to the nature and sensitivity of information and to introduce implied consent conditionally.

personal credit informationnatural personpublic interestsensitive informationimplied consent

张路、王立颖

展开 >

湘潭大学信用风险管理学院,湖南湘潭 411105

个人信用信息 自然人 公共利益 敏感信息 默示同意

国家重点研发计划

2022YFC330320001

2024

太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)
太原理工大学

太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.218
ISSN:1009-5837
年,卷(期):2024.42(2)
  • 49