首页|地域、种族、优生学:论安德森与福克纳的文学创作异见

地域、种族、优生学:论安德森与福克纳的文学创作异见

扫码查看
对比分析安德森与福克纳的作品细节,回顾后者对前者的戏谑评价,可发现两位作家在作品中传达的地域观、种族观、血统观有明显差异,先后分别构成对优生学种族本质主义主张的容纳和批驳.对二者创作异见的彰显并非否认其风格的共性和关联,而旨在揭示他们对盎格鲁-撒克逊民族主义的不同立场,进而深度剖析两代美国作家写作视阈的动态传承和演进,更以此管窥20世纪初美国文学界与种族科学话语的跨界互动.
Region,Race,Eugenics:On Anderson and Faulkner's Different Literary Visions
A close examination of Anderson and Faulkner's works and a review of the latter's parodic comments on the former demonstrate the two writers'different views on region,race,and blood,with Anderson's initial accommodation and Faulkner's later refutation of the racial essentialism embedded in eugenics.This study does not intend to deny their stylistic similarities and connections,but to reveal their different positions on Anglo-Saxon nationalism,further unravel the dynamic inheritance and evolution of their literary visions,and meanwhile offer a glimpse into the cross-boundary dialogue between the early-20th-century American literature and the discourses of racial science.

Sherwood AndersonWilliam Faulknerregionraceeugenics

张玉婷

展开 >

首都经济贸易大学外国语学院,北京 100070

安德森 福克纳 地域 种族 优生学

2024

外国文学
北京外国语大学

外国文学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.384
ISSN:1002-5529
年,卷(期):2024.(4)