首页|钢渣资源化的微表处养护技术环境影响量化分析

钢渣资源化的微表处养护技术环境影响量化分析

扫码查看
文中基于全生命周期评价(LCA)方法建立了微表处养护的环境影响量化框架,利用原子吸收光谱仪(ICP)评估钢渣集料和两种天然集料的重金属排放特性,基于LCA分析框架量化对比了钢渣集料和玄武岩的微表处养护的能耗和碳排放量.结果表明:钢渣集料重金属排放高于玄武岩和石灰岩,但陈化处理后其重金属浓度符合我国地表水第Ⅲ类水要求.同时,在功能单位内玄武岩微表处养护能耗为47.25 GJ,伴随产生2 749.52 kg当量CO2,而钢渣微表处消耗47.15 GJ,产生2 848.72 kg当量CO2原材料生产阶段的显著差异导致玄武岩比钢渣集料微表处养护产生更多的能耗,但排放了更少的当量的CO2.
Quantitative Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Micro Surfacing Maintenance with Steel Slag Recycling Technology
Based on the life cycle assessment(LCA)method,a quantitative framework of environmen-tal impact of micro-surfacing maintenance was established.Atomic absorption spectrometer(ICP)was used to evaluate the heavy metal emission characteristics of steel slag aggregate and two kinds of natu-ral aggregate,and the energy consumption and carbon emission of micro-surface curing of steel slag aggregate and basalt were quantitatively compared based on LCA analysis framework.The results show that the heavy metal emission of steel slag aggregate is higher than that of basalt and limestone,but its heavy metal concentration after aging treatment meets the requirements of Class Ⅲ surface wa-ter in China.At the same time,the energy consumption of basalt micro-surface maintenance in func-tional units is 47.25 GJ,accompanied by 2749.52 kg equivalent CO2.However,47.15 GJ is con-sumed at the micro surface of steel slag,and 2848.72 kg equivalent CO2 is produced.Significant differences in the production stages of raw materials lead to more energy consumption of basalt than micro-surfacing maintenance of steel slag aggregate,but less equivalent CO2 emission.

steel slag recyclingmicro surfacingasphalt pavementheavy metals dischargeslife cycle assessment

朱小良、李红兵、汪福松

展开 >

武汉理工大学土木工程与建筑学院 武汉 430070

华中科技大学土木与水利工程学院 武汉 430074

钢渣资源化 微表处 沥青路面 重金属排放 全生命周期评价

福建省交通运输科技项目

202261

2024

武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)
武汉理工大学

武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.462
ISSN:2095-3844
年,卷(期):2024.48(4)