摘要
文章主要讨论了胡塞尔、海德格尔和萨特对于共同体是如何构成的这个问题提供的三种现象学的路径.胡塞尔对于现实的德国和欧洲共同体的理解与他现象学中关于Einfühlung(同感或移情)作为共同体形成的方式之间具有某种张力,但是在胡塞尔的理论中我们发现,Einfühlung究竟是"同感"还是"移情",这个区分成了理解真正的人类共同体的关键.海德格尔认为,移情应该建立在共在的基础之上,他把共在作为此在的内在本质部分,强调的是非本真和本真共同体的关系.萨特认为,海德格尔的共在不应该是理论的前提,而是需要进行仔细分析的对象.在萨特看来,人与人之间的根本关系是冲突,不可能存在真正的Einfühlung.文章最后以"同感"(不是"移情")为核心概念,讨论了community与communion之间的内在本质联系,指出真正人类共同体的可能路径.
Abstract
The article tries to show that the relation between Einfühlung and communion is a determinative factor in forming a community for human beings.This study is based on the interpretations of Husserl,Heidegger and Sartre.Its central idea is that a community must be such a unique being which is both universal and individual;it is an incarnated being.A community is consisted of individuals,and at the same time,it must of itself be an individual.At the end of the article,it shows that truth is the essence of community.