首页|王、湛的交往与论辩及其对"心"的不同理解

王、湛的交往与论辩及其对"心"的不同理解

扫码查看
王阳明和湛甘泉虽然同属心学阵营,却对"心"有着不同的理解,其不同处主要表现在三方面:其一,阳明主张"心体"是"无善无恶"与"至善"的统一,而甘泉认为"心体"只能是纯粹"至善"的;其二,二人都承认"本心"的"至善"性,但是阳明主张其"至善"性来源于"本心"自身,而甘泉则主张来源于"至善"之"天理";其三,甘泉强调"心"是"体万物而不遗"的"大心","心"与"物"不存在内与外的分别,阳明则强调"心"在感应过程中的主宰作用.由此三方面的不同,就导致他们在儒释道之关系和"格物"问题上有着不同的致思趋向.
Wang Yangming and Zhan Ganquan's Association and Debates and Their Different Understandings of the"Mind"
Although Wang Yangming and Zhan Ganquan belonged to the same camp of the study of the mind,they had different under-standings of"mind",which were mainly reflected in three aspects:First,Wang maintained that the"mind"is the unity of"no good and no evil"and"supreme good",while Zhan believed that the"mind"can only be pure"supreme good";Second,both of them admit the"supreme goodness"of the"original mind",but Wang maintained that the"supreme goodness"comes from the"original mind"itself,while Zhan maintained that it comes from the"heavenly principle"of the"supreme goodness".Third,Zhan emphasized that the"mind"is a"big mind"that"embodies all things without leaving anything",and there is no difference between"mind"and"things",while Wang emphasized the dominant role of the"mind"in the process of induction.Their differences in these three aspects lead to their different thinking trends regarding the relationship between Confucianism,Buddhism and Taoism and the investigation of things.

Wang YangmingZhan GanquanRelationship between Confucianism,Buddhism and TaoismInvestigation of thingsCon-science

张细进

展开 >

江苏大学 马克思主义学院,江苏 镇江 212013

王阳明 湛甘泉 儒释道关系 格物 本心

2024年广东省哲学社会科学规划项目

GD24YZX06

2024

五邑大学学报(社会科学版)
五邑大学

五邑大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.146
ISSN:1009-1513
年,卷(期):2024.26(3)