温州医科大学学报2025,Vol.55Issue(1) :41-45.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2025.01.007

肺泡灌洗液Xpert、抗酸杆菌涂片、分枝杆菌培养对痰液Xpert阴性肺结核的诊断价值

The diagnostic value of Xpert,acid-fast bacillus smear,and mycobacterium culture in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for sputum Xpert negative tuberculosis:A comparative study

缪星国 叶慧 余小添 章仕淼 苏菲菲
温州医科大学学报2025,Vol.55Issue(1) :41-45.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2025.01.007

肺泡灌洗液Xpert、抗酸杆菌涂片、分枝杆菌培养对痰液Xpert阴性肺结核的诊断价值

The diagnostic value of Xpert,acid-fast bacillus smear,and mycobacterium culture in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for sputum Xpert negative tuberculosis:A comparative study

缪星国 1叶慧 1余小添 2章仕淼 2苏菲菲3
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 温州医科大学定理临床学院温州市中心医院 感染科,浙江 温州 325000;温州市第六人民医院感染和免疫科,浙江 温州 325000
  • 2. 温州医科大学定理临床学院温州市中心医院 感染科,浙江 温州 325000
  • 3. 温州医科大学定理临床学院温州市中心医院 感染科,浙江 温州 325000;温州市新发与再发传染病诊治重点实验室,浙江 温州 325000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨3种肺泡灌洗液检测方法对痰液Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert)阴性肺结核的诊断价值.方法:选取2021年1月至2023年6月间温州市中心医院收治的痰液Xpert阴性的疑似肺结核患者121例,所有患者均予肺泡灌洗液Xpert、抗酸杆菌涂片、分枝杆菌培养,以临床诊断结果为确诊标准,回顾性比较3种检测方法的诊断价值.结果:121例疑似肺结核患者中有73例诊断为肺结核,肺结核患者比非肺结核患者更年轻(P<0.05).肺泡灌洗液Xpert的AUC为0.774、灵敏度为54.79%、特异度为100%;抗酸杆菌涂片的AUC为0.510、灵敏度为8.22%、特异度为93.75%;分枝杆菌培养的AUC为0.667、灵敏度为52.05%、特异度为80.85%;3种方法联合检测的AUC为0.721、灵敏度为63.01%、特异度为81.25%.Xpert和联合检测的AUC差异无统计学意义,两者均要高于抗酸杆菌涂片、分枝杆菌培养.3种方法联合的检测灵敏度最高,Xpert次之,抗酸杆菌涂片最低.结论:肺泡灌洗液Xpert、抗酸杆菌涂片、分枝杆菌培养联合检测能够提高痰液Xpert阴性肺结核的诊断性能,减少肺结核的漏诊.

Abstract

Objective:To explore the diagnostic value of 3 detection methods in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF)for sputum Xpert MTB/RIF(Xpert)-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.Methods:A total of 121 suspected pulmonary tuberculosis patients with negative sputum of Xpert from Wenzhou Central Hospital who were treated between January 2021 and June 2023 were enrolled and all patients were sent for examinations of BALF-Xpert,acid-fast bacillus(AFB)smear,and mycobacterium culture.Retrospective comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of 3 tests was made based on clinical diagnostic results as the diagnostic criteria.Results:Seventy-three of 121 suspected patients were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis.Compared with the non-tuberculosis group,patients in the tuberculosis group were significantly younger(P<0.05).The AUC of BALF-Xpert was 0.774,sensitivity 54.79%and specificity 100%.The AUC of BALF-AFB smear was 0.510,and the sensitivity and specificity was 8.22%and 93.75%.BALF mycobacterium culture had AUC of 0.667,sensitivity of 52.05%,and specificity of 80.85%.The combination of 3 methods achieved AUC of 0.721,sensitivity of 63.01%,specificity of 81.25%.No significant difference was found in AUC between Xpert and the combination of 3 methods,with both higher than those in mycobacterium culture and AFB smear.The combination of 3 methods yielded the highest sensitivity,followed by Xpert,with AFB smear had the lowest.Conclusion:Combined testing of BALF-Xpert,AFB smear,and mycobacterium culture can improve the diagnostic performance of sputum Xpert-negative pulmonary tuberculosis,and reduce the underdiagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.

关键词

肺泡灌洗液/肺结核/Xpert/MTB/RIF/分枝杆菌培养/抗酸杆菌涂片/诊断性能

Key words

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid/pulmonary tuberculosis/Xpert MTB/RIF/mycobacterium culture/acid-fast bacillus smear/diagnostic performance

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2025
温州医科大学学报
温州医学院

温州医科大学学报

影响因子:0.762
ISSN:2095-9400
段落导航相关论文