Most of the existing research on the crime of environmental pollution mainly focuses on theoretical exploration,and there is insufficient attention to the overall situation of judicial application in practice.Converting the qualitative and application of environmental pollution in judicial practice into quantifiable data language,by using a quantitative empirical research model and through analysis,it is found that the application of"violating national regulations"in judicial practice has some normative problems in the writing of judgment documents,the types of toxic and hazardous substances and the scope of other hazardous substances need to be explained in detail,and judicial interpretation to the provisions of the elements of the"serious pollution of the environment"and"particularly serious consequences"need to correspond one by one.The unpredictability of sentencing in judicial practice has shown this problem,and"particularly serious consequences"can be interpreted as"serious circumstances".Therefore,judicial practice should pay attention to perfecting the standardization of judicial judgment documents,reducing the irregularity in the sentencing process so as to improve the identification and application of this crime in judicial practice.
judicial big datacrime of polluting the environmentserious circumstances
万方数据
