首页|国内外体育治理研究热点与前沿比较——基于CiteSpace知识图谱量化研究

国内外体育治理研究热点与前沿比较——基于CiteSpace知识图谱量化研究

扫码查看
通过CNKI和WOS选取国内外核心期刊878篇文献为样本,使用CiteSpace软件对国内外体育治理研究热点和前沿进行系统比较分析,得出结论如下:国内体育治理的关键词聚焦在"协同治理"更符合当下体育发展现状,而国外的体育治理研究的高频关键词集中在"governance(治理)",这个关键词贯穿了国外对体育治理的研究."体育治理"、"体育管理"、"协同治理"相互关联、相互影响,构成国内体育治理领域的主体研究内容."sport policy"、"sport governance"、"politics",说明国外更偏向体育政策对体育治理带来的影响以及体育治理在政治上的作用;未来体育治理的发展趋势会向"协同治理"方向迈进.
Comparison of Hot Spots and Frontiers of Sports Governance——A Quantitative Research Based on CiteSpace Knowledge Graph
Through CNKI and WOS,878 domestic and foreign core journals were selected as the study samples,CiteSpace software was used to systematically compare and analyze domestic and foreign sports governance research hotspots and frontiers.The conclusions are as follows:the key words of domestic sports governance focus on"collaborative governance",which is more in line with the current situation of sports development;while the high-frequency keywords of foreign sports governance researches focus on the word"governance",which runs through foreign research on sports governance."Sports governance","sports management"and"collaborative governance"are interrelated and influence with each other,which constitute the main research content in the fields of domestic sports governance;"sport policy","sport governance"and"politics"illustrate sports policies on sports governance and the role of sports governance in politics in foreign countries;the future development trend of sports governance will move towards the direction of"collaborative governance".

sports governancehotspotscomparisonCiteSpacevisual analysis

李圆圆、雍明、谢尚森

展开 >

苏州大学体育学院,江苏苏州 215021

阜阳师范大学体育学院,安徽阜阳 236037

体育治理 热点 比较 CiteSpace 可视化分析

安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目

AHSKQ2020D108

2024

西安文理学院学报(自然科学版)
西安文理学院

西安文理学院学报(自然科学版)

影响因子:0.209
ISSN:1008-5564
年,卷(期):2024.27(1)
  • 7