首页|"放逐"与"回归"——以《牡丹亭》"花园"的叙事功能为观照点

"放逐"与"回归"——以《牡丹亭》"花园"的叙事功能为观照点

扫码查看
作为与"家园"同义的"花园"在《牡丹亭》中并不纯粹是"符号化表征空间",其承担着一定的叙事功能,表现为以"家园"空间为核心的"放逐—回归"叙事模式.然而,我们也应区分中西文论之哲学支点殊异,需对这一叙事模式进行本土化书写.而对于"花园"叙事意义的分析,将涉及前人业已讨论的空间与权力、空间与性别、空间与存在等问题.因此,拈出"花园"为观照点具有以一总多的效果.游园是对父权话语的反抗、服从性空间的逃逸,同时也是人性自然化的手段.丽娘于"花园"这一"异托邦"中,实现了从"放逐"到"回归"的生命体验,回到"家园"完成了个体自由性的确证.
"Exile"and"Return"——Taking the Narrative Function of"Garden"in the Peony Pavilion as the Point of Observation
As the synonym of"home","garden"in"Peony Pavilion"is not purely"symbolic represen-tation space",but bears a certain narrative function,which is manifested as the"exile-return"narrative mode with"home"space as the core.However,we should also distinguish the difference in the philosophical fulcrum of Chinese and Western literary theory,and we need to localize this narrative mode.The analysis of the narrative meaning of"garden"will involve problems like space and power,space and gender,space and exist-ence,which have been discussed by predecessors.Therefore,picking out the"garden"as the observation point has the effect of one total.The garden is a resistance to patriarchal discourse,an escape from the space of obe-dience,and a means to naturalize human nature.In the"Garden",the"Heterotopia",Li Niang realized the life experience from"exile"to"return",and returned to the"home"to complete the confirmation of individual freedom.

narratologyliterary space criticismthe Peony Pavilionpower discourse

王智超

展开 >

西安工业大学文学院,陕西西安 710021

叙事学 文学空间批评 牡丹亭 权力话语

2024

西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)
西安石油大学

西安石油大学学报(社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.287
ISSN:1008-5645
年,卷(期):2024.33(3)
  • 1