首页|超声引导坐骨神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对老年股骨颈骨折患者全身麻醉的效果

超声引导坐骨神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对老年股骨颈骨折患者全身麻醉的效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨超声引导坐骨神经阻滞复合全身麻醉对老年股骨颈骨折患者全身麻醉的效果。方法 选取收治的90例老年股骨颈骨折患者,用随机数字表法将入组患者分为观察组(n=45)和对照组(n=45)。对照组予以全身麻醉(芬太尼、依托咪酯和罗库溴铵),观察组在对照组麻醉的基础上复合超声引导坐骨神经阻滞。记录2组患者的拔管时间、麻醉苏醒时间和住院时间以及围手术期心率(heart rate,HR)、呼吸频率(respiratory rate,RR)、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)和经皮血氧饱和度(transcutaneous oxygen saturation,SPO2);用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)和临床镇静评分表(Ramsay Sedation Score,Ramsay 评分)评估患者术后不同时间点的疼痛和镇静效果;术后用Steward苏醒评分及简易精神状态评定量表(mini-mental state examination,MMSE)评估患者的苏醒质量及认知功能,并记录患者不良反应发生情况。结果 观察组患者麻醉苏醒时间、住院时间及拔管时间均短于对照组(P<0。05);术前(t1)2组的HR、RR、MAP和SPO2水平比较差异无统计学意义,术中15 min(t2)、术中30 min(t3)和术毕时(t4)时观察组的HR、RR、MAP和SPO2水平均显著低于对照组(P<0。05);术后2、12、24h,观察组的VAS及Ramsay评分均显著低于对照组(P<0。05)。观察组MMSE和Steward评分均显著高于对照组(P<0。05);观察组不良反应发生率(8。88%)与对照组(15。56%)比较差异无统计学意义。结论 超声引导坐骨神经阻滞复合全身麻醉应用于老年股骨颈骨折患者麻醉效果较好,可起到良好的镇痛、镇静作用,有利于维持血流动力学稳定,提高患者的苏醒质量,降低对认知功能的损伤,促进术后恢复。
General anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block combined with general anesthesia in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures
Objective To explore general anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block combined with general anesthesia in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures.Methods A total of 90 elderly patients with femoral neck fractures were enrolled.According to random number table method,they were divided into observation group(n=45)and control group(n=45).The control group was given general anesthesia(fentanyl,etomidate and rocuronium bromide),while the observation group was additionally given ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block.The extubation time,anesthesia recovery time,hospitalization time,perioperative heart rate(HR),respiration rate(RR),mean arterial pressure(MAP)and transcutaneous oxygen saturation(SPO2)in both groups were re-corded.The postoperative pain and sedation effect were evaluated by visual analogue scale(VAS)and Ramsay sedation score.The postoperative recovery quality and cognitive function were evaluated by Steward recovery scale and mini-mental state examination(MMSE).The occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded.Results The anesthesia recovery time,hospitalization time and extuba-tion time in observation group were better than those in control group(P<0.05).Before surgery(t1),the difference in HR,RR,MAP and SPO2 between the 2 groups was not statistically significant,but which were significantly lower in observation group than control group at 15 minutes during the surgery(t2),30 minutes during the surgery(t3)and after surgery(t4,P<0.05).At 2,12 and 24 hours after surgery,the VAS and Ramsay scores in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group(P<0.05).The MMSE and Steward scores in observation group were significantly higher than those in control group(P<0.05).The difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between observation group and control group was not statistically significant(8.88%vs.15.56%).Conclusion The anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block combined with general anesthesia is good in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures,which has good analgesic and sedative effects,and is beneficial to maintain hemodynamics stability,improve recovery quality,reduce the injury to cognitive function and promote postoperative recovery.

ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve blockgeneral anesthesiaelderly femoral neck fracturehemodynamicsrecovery qual-ityanesthesia induction

王雅倩、钟盼、韩林荟

展开 >

秦皇岛市第二医院麻醉科,秦皇岛 066600

秦皇岛市第二医院手术室,秦皇岛 066600

秦皇岛市第二医院普外科,秦皇岛 066600

超声引导坐骨神经阻滞 全身麻醉 老年股骨颈骨折 血流动力学 苏醒质量 麻醉诱导

秦皇岛市重点研发计划科技支撑计划

202101A158

2024

西北药学杂志
西安交通大学,陕西省药学会

西北药学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.912
ISSN:1004-2407
年,卷(期):2024.39(2)
  • 20