首页|论《诗品》对颜延之、鲍照诗的评价

论《诗品》对颜延之、鲍照诗的评价

扫码查看
《诗品》评颜延之诗"喜用古事",对这一观点后世基本认同.用典繁密其实与钟嵘的审美理念相悖,但在钟嵘心中颜延之是雅正的典范,所以还是把他列于中品.《诗品》评鲍照诗"危仄""险俗",针对这一观点则存在较多争议.理清其背后的涵义还需结合《诗品》原文以及《文心雕龙》等对"危仄""险俗"的解读.钟嵘将鲍照列于中品也有他自己的考量.
Zhong Rong's Comment on the Poetry of Yan Yanzhi and Bao Zhao in Shi Pin
Shi Pin holds that Yan Yanzhi prefers allusions in his poems,which is basically recognized by later generations,while Zhong Rong dislikes allusions to be frequently used.Nonetheless,he still lists Yan Yanzhi in the middle for he firmly believes that Yan is a model of elegance.However,Zhong Rong criticizes Bao Zhao's poems for using rare vocabulary to pursue the realistic scenery.This comment generates dispute.To clarify its underlying meaning,it is necessary to combine the interpretations from works such as Shi Pin and Wenxin Dia-olong.Zhong Rong also had his own considerations when listing Bao Zhao in the middle.

Zhong RongShi PinYan YanzhiBao Zhao

王春雨

展开 >

吉林大学文学院,吉林长春 130012

钟嵘 《诗品》 颜延之 鲍照

2024

许昌学院学报
许昌学院

许昌学院学报

影响因子:0.196
ISSN:1671-9824
年,卷(期):2024.43(3)