首页|上市公司董事会征集股东权利的法理证成

上市公司董事会征集股东权利的法理证成

扫码查看
修订后的《证券法》赋予上市公司董事会征集人资格.董事会发起的征集,难用委托代理或合同关系解释,使其面临行为失效与责任虚设的理论阐释与规范适用的困境.基于董事会符合征集人设定的基本标准、民事主体制度的开放性可容纳赋予董事会征集人资格的制度设计、赋予董事会征集人资格的道德风险总体可控等原因,可证赋予董事会征集人资格具有正当性.董事会的征集行为可定性为一种公司治理行为,其征集责任可通过异议董事免责、独立董事决议资格排除等设计衔接《公司法》与《证券法》的有关规定.
The Jurisprudential Justification of Proxy Solicitation by the Board of Directors of Listed Companies
The revised Securities Law grants the qualification of solicitor to the board of directors of listed companies.The solicitation initiated by the board of directors is difficult to be explained in terms of the principal-agent or contractual relationship,and this leads to the dilemma of theoretical interpretation and normative application of civil act invalidation and responsibility nullification.Considering that the board of directors meets the basic qualification of solicitor set by the law,the openness of the civil subject system can accommodate the granting of the solicitor of the board,and the overall control of the moral hazard,it is justified to grant the qualification of the solicitor of the board of directors.The solicitation behavior of the board of directors can be characterized as a kind of corporate governance behavior,and its liability of proxy solicitation can be assigned to the directors,by codes of the Company Law and the Securities Law,such as the exemption of dissenting directors and the exclusion of independent directors'resolution qualification.

board of directorsproxy solicitationliability of proxy solicitation

杨朝越

展开 >

重庆工商大学 法学与社会学学院,重庆 400067

董事会 征集行为 征集责任

重庆市社会科学规划项目

BS2022135108

2024

现代法学
西南政法大学

现代法学

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:2.725
ISSN:1001-2397
年,卷(期):2024.46(2)
  • 51