首页|(35+50+35)m"双U+箱形"组合截面连续U梁有效宽度研究

(35+50+35)m"双U+箱形"组合截面连续U梁有效宽度研究

扫码查看
为充分了解连续U梁的结构性能,基于南京至句容城际轨道交通工程(35+50+35)m双线连续U梁,通过建立midas Civil平面杆系模型、midas FEA三维实体模型,结合施工监测数据,对两种模型进行结构计算及结果对比.分析结果表明:杆系模型、实体模型的计算结果和施工监测数据整体变化趋势一致,但相比实体模型,杆系模型未考虑剪力滞效应对截面应力分布的影响,计算结果偏不安全,而实体模型计算结果与实际比较吻合,且能够准确地反映结构真实的应力分布状况.通过各荷载工况下实体模型应力分布的对比,得出截面的有效分布宽度折减系数,代入杆系模型中对截面尺寸进行修正,验证了有效宽度的合理性,得出引入有效宽度的"双U+箱形"组合截面连续U梁杆系模型的简化算法.
Investigation on Effective Width of(35+50+35)m"Double U+Box"Composite Section Continuous U-beams
In order to fully understand the structural performance of continuous U-beams,based on the(35+50+35)m double-line continuous U-beams of the Nanjing-Jurong intercity rail transport engineering,midas Civil and midas FEA are used to build the planar rod model and the three-dimensional solid model respectively.The structural calculations and results of the two models are compared with the construction monitoring data.Analysis shows that the overall trend of results from both the rod and solid models aligns with monitoring data,but the rod model does not account for the shear lag effect on stress dis-tribution across the section,leading to conservative results.The calculation results of the solid model align more closely with the actual situation and can accurately reflect the real stress distributions.By comparing stress distributions under various load conditions in the solid model,the effective width reduction coefficients for the cross-section were derived and applied to adjust the cross-section in the rod model.This confirms the rationality of the effective width and yields a simplified calcula-tion method for the rod model of the"double U+box"composite section continuous U-beams with effective width considered.

"double U+box"composite sectioncontinuous U-beameffective width reduction coefficientsimplified calcula-tion method

陈娣、鲜文博、杨玲、毛耀增

展开 >

苏交科集团股份有限公司,南京 210019

"双U+箱形"组合截面 连续U梁 有效宽度折减系数 简化算法

2024

现代交通技术
江苏省交通科学研究院

现代交通技术

影响因子:0.431
ISSN:1672-9889
年,卷(期):2024.21(6)