首页|经皮肾镜取石术分期治疗结石性脓肾临床效果的Meta分析

经皮肾镜取石术分期治疗结石性脓肾临床效果的Meta分析

Stage-by-stage clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for calculous pyonephrosis:a Meta-analysis

扫码查看
目的 本研究旨在评价Ⅰ期经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)和Ⅰ期经皮肾穿刺造瘘术(PCN)、Ⅱ期 PCNL治疗结石性脓肾患者的临床疗效,以确定此类患者最佳手术方案的选择.方法 全面检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和EMBASE数据库以及中国知网、万方、维普数据库,于 2012 年 1 月—2022 年 10 月发表的有关于结石性脓肾研究的文章,并根据纳入和排除标准选择文献.在检索数据并评价文献质量后,采用 Review Manager software(RevMan 5.4.3,Cochrane协作网,Oxford,UK)进行 Meta分析.结果 本文从 105 项研究中选择了 11 项共 688 例患者.其中 347 例接受Ⅰ期 PCNL治疗,341 例患者接受Ⅰ期PCN及Ⅱ期PCNL治疗(以下简称Ⅱ期PCNL).Meta分析结果显示:Ⅰ期 PCNL和Ⅱ期 PCNL在结石清除率(P=0.95)、手术时间(P=0.48)、术后感染性休克(P=0.36)、肾周积液感染(P=0.27)方面差异无统计学意义;Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期PCNL在术后发热(P=0.03)、留置肾造瘘管时间(P<0.01)、住院费用(P<0.01)、住院时间(P<0.01)、术后住院时间(P=0.02)方面差异有统计学意义.对于结石性脓肾患者的治疗,以上 2 种方案在结石清除率、手术时间、术后发生肾周积液感染及感染性休克的发生方面类似.虽然Ⅰ期 PCNL术后发热的患者更多,但是住院费用更低,留置肾造瘘管时间、总住院时间、术后住院时间更短.结论 Ⅰ期PCNL治疗肾及输尿管上段结石合并脓肾是经济、安全、有效的,在临床实践中具备一定的推广价值.
Objective To identify the best surgical treatment for patients with calculous pyonephrosis by evaluating the clinical effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy(PCNL)in stage Ⅰ,percutaneous nephrostomy(PCN)in stage Ⅰ,and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in stage Ⅱ.Methods For publications published between Jan.2012 and Oct.2022,we thoroughly examined the databases of PubMed,Cochrane Library,Web of Science,EMBASE,CNKI,Wanfang,and VIP.We then chosed the literature based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.After data were retrieved and literature quality was assessed,Review Manager software(RevMan 5.4.3,Cochrane Collaboration,Oxford,UK)was utilized to Meta-analysis.Results Out of 688 participants across 105 researches,we chosed 11 trials.Among them,341 patients received both stage Ⅰ PCN and stage Ⅱ PCNL(hereinafter referred to as phase Ⅱ PCNL),while 347 patients received stage Ⅰ PCNL.According to the results of the Meta-analysis,there was no discernible difference between stage Ⅰ PCNL and stage Ⅱ PCNL in terms of stone clearance rate(P=0.95),operation duration(P=0.48),postoperative septic shock(P=0.36),or perirenal effusion infection(P=0.27).There were significant differences between stage Ⅰ PCNL and stage Ⅱ PCNL in fever(P=0.03),indwelling nephrostomy tube time(P = 0.01),hospitalization costs(P = 0.01),hospitalization time(P = 0.01),and postoperative hospitalization time(P=0.02).The following two regimens were comparable in terms of stone clearance rate,operating time,postoperative perirenal effusion infection,and septic shock for patients with calculous pyonephrosis.Despite the fact that there were more patients who developed fever after stage Ⅰ PCNL,hospitalization costs were lower,indwelling nephrostomy tube time,overall hospitalization time,and postoperative hospitalization time were all reduced.Conclusion Ⅰ PCNL was affordable,safe,and successful for treating renal and upper ureteral calculi with pyonephrosis,and it had some promotional value in clinical practice.

urinary calculicalculous pyonephrosispercutaneous nephrolithotomypercutaneous nephrostomyMeta-analysisone-stage surgerystaged surgery

杨斌、耿尔康、万川平、牛愿坚、李玉志、刘建和

展开 >

昆明医科大学第二附属医院泌尿外科,云南昆明 650106

泌尿系结石 结石性脓肾 经皮肾镜取石术 经皮肾穿刺造瘘术 荟萃分析 Ⅰ期手术 分期手术

国家自然科学基金

82060137

2024

现代泌尿外科杂志
西安交通大学

现代泌尿外科杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.106
ISSN:1009-8291
年,卷(期):2024.29(1)
  • 16