首页|不同益生菌制剂对溃疡性结肠炎患者血清TMAO、凝血功能和肠道黏膜屏障功能的影响比较

不同益生菌制剂对溃疡性结肠炎患者血清TMAO、凝血功能和肠道黏膜屏障功能的影响比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同益生菌制剂对溃疡性结肠炎患者血清氧化三甲胺(TMAO)、凝血功能和肠道黏膜屏障功能的影响差异,从而为溃疡性结肠炎治疗中益生菌制剂的应用和选择提供参考依据.方法 选取2023年1月至2024年2月中国人民解放军南部战区总医院收治的120例活动期、轻中度溃疡性结肠炎患者,随机数字表法分为A组(n=30)、B组(n=30)、C组(n=30)和D组(n=30).四组均口服美沙拉嗪肠溶片(1 g/次,3次/d)治疗,此外,A组、B组、C组分别采用培菲康(0.42 g/次,2次/d)、金双歧(2 g/次,2次/d)、美常安(0.5 g/次,3次/d)等不同益生菌制剂治疗,四组均持续治疗观察2个月.治疗后进行四组改良Mayo评分和改良Baron内镜评分评价比较,同时评价比较四组治疗有效率,并统计比较四组不良反应发生率.检测比较四组治疗前后的凝血功能指标[凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、血浆纤维蛋白原(Fib)]、血清TMAO、炎症因子[C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]和肠道黏膜屏障功能[二胺氧化酶(DAO)、D-乳酸、内毒素脂多糖(LPS)]水平.结果 D组治疗有效率低于其他三组而其治疗后改良Mayo评分和改良Baron内镜评分则高于其他三组(P<0.05);C组治疗有效率低于A组和B组而其治疗后改良Mayo评分和改良Baron内镜评分则高于A组和B组(P<0.05);B组治疗后改良Mayo评分和改良Baron内镜评分高于A组(P<0.05);但A组和B组的治疗有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).与同组治疗前比较,治疗后四组PT和APTT均缩短而其血浆Fib水平及血清TMAO、IL-6、TNF-α、CRP、DAO、D-乳酸、LPS水平则均降低(P<0.05).治疗后四组PT、APTT、血浆Fib水平及血清TMAO、IL-6、TNF-α、CRP、DAO、D-乳酸、LPS水平比较,A组<B组<C组<D组(P<0.05).A组、B组、C组不良反应发生率均低于D组(P<0.05);而A组、B组、C组的不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 益生菌制剂在溃疡性结肠炎患者中的应用有助于提高临床治疗有效率,改善患者临床症状、凝血功能、炎症反应和肠道黏膜屏障功能,且可减少不良反应的发生,其应用安全可靠,其中多联益生菌制剂的应用效果优于单菌制剂,且培菲康应用效果最优.
Comparison of the effects of different probiotic preparations on serum TMAO,coagulation function,and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with ulcerative colitis
Objective To explore the differences in the effects of different probiotic preparations on serum trimethylamine oxide(TMAO),coagulation function,and intestinal mucosal barrier function in patients with ulcerative colitis,in order to provide reference for the application and selection of probiotic preparations in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.Methods 120 patients with active,mild to moderate ulcerative colitis admitted Into the General Hospital of the Southern Theater Command of the People's Liberation Army of China from January 2023 to February 2024 were selected and randomly divided into group A(n=30),Group B(n=30),Group C(n=30)and Group D(n=30)by random number table method.All four groups were treated with oral administration of mesalazine enteric coated tablets(1 g/time,3 times/day).In addition,Group A,Group B and Group C were treated with different probiotic preparations such as Peifeikang(0.42 g/time,2 times/day),Jinshuangqi(2 g/time,2 times/day),and Meichangan(0.5 g/time,3 times/day).All four groups were continuously treated and observed for 2 months.After treatment,modified Mayo score and modified Baron endoscopic score of the four groups were evaluated and compared,the treatment efficacy of the four groups were evaluated and the incidence of adverse reactions among the four groups was statistically compared.The before and after treatment coagulation function indicators(prothrombin time(PT),activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),plasma fibrinogen(Fig)),serum TMAO,inflammatory factors(C-reactive protein(CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α),interleukin-6(IL-6))and intestinal mucosal barrier function(diamine oxidase(DAO),D-lactate and lipopolysaccharide(LPS))levels among the four groups were compared.Results Compared with the other three groups,the treatment effective rate of in Group D was lower,while the modified Mayo score and modified Baron endoscopic score after treatment in Group D were higher(P<0.05);The treatment effective rate in Group C was lower than those of Group A and Group B,while the modified Mayo score and modified Baron endoscopic score after treatment in Group C were higher than those in Group A and Group B(P<0.05);The after treatment modified Mayo score and modified Baron endoscopic score in Group B were higher than those in Group A(P<0.05);However,there was no statistically significant difference in the treatment effectiveness between Group A and Group B(P>0.05).Compared with those of before treatment in the same group,the after treatment PT and APTT in all four groups were shortened,while their plasma FIB levels and serum TMAO,IL-6,TNF-α,CRP,DAO,D-lactate,LPS levels were also all decreased(P<0.05).Comparison results of after treatment APTT,PT,plasma FIB levels and serum TMAO,IL-6,TNF-α,CRP,DAO,D-lactate,LPS level of four groups showed that Group A<Group B<Group C<Group D(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in Group D were lower than that in Group A,Group B and Group C(P<0.05);While there was no statistically significant difference among that of Group A,Group B and Group C(P>0.05).Conclusion The application of probiotic preparations in patients with ulcerative colitis can help improve clinical treatment efficiency,improve clinical symptoms,coagulation function,inflammatory response,and intestinal mucosal barrier function,and reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions.Its application is safe and reliable,among which the application effect of multi probiotic preparations is better than that of single probiotic preparations,and the application effect of Peifeikang is the best.

Probiotic preparationsUlcerative colitisTrimethylamine oxide(TMAO)Coagulation functionIntestinal mucosal barrier function

刘帅、冯欢欢、李昂

展开 >

510000 中国人民解放军南部战区总医院消化内科

510000 中国人民解放军南部战区总医院保健科

益生菌制剂 溃疡性结肠炎 氧化三甲胺(TMAO) 凝血功能 肠道黏膜屏障功能

2024

现代消化及介入诊疗
广东省医学学术交流中心

现代消化及介入诊疗

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.019
ISSN:1672-2159
年,卷(期):2024.29(7)