首页|热带地区胃幽门螺杆菌检测方法在诊断中的对比分析

热带地区胃幽门螺杆菌检测方法在诊断中的对比分析

扫码查看
目的 本研究聚焦于中国热带地区(海口市和广州市),评估在幽门螺旋杆菌(H.pylori)感染诊断中碳14尿素呼气试验(14C-UBT)与快速尿素酶试验(RUT)的效能.方法 从2023年6月至8月,我们在海南医学院第二附属医院和中国人民解放军南部战区总医院招募了共300名主诉上腹部不适的患者,每位患者分别接受了 14C-UBT和RUT检测.我们记录并分析了两种检测方法的H.pylori感染阳性率,以及它们之间的统计学差异.结果 结果表明,14C-UBT阳性率分别为32.67%和31.33%,RUT则为30.00%和26.00%,尽管两种方法的阳性率存在差异,但这些差异在统计学上不显著(P>0.05).然而,在灵敏度方面,14C-UBT的表现明显优于RUT(P<0.05).14C-UBT虽非侵入性且更精准,但受限于仪器与放射性.RUT操作简便、耗时短,但作为有创检查,其准确度略低.结论 热带地区H.pylori感染的诊断应根据实际情况采用不同检测方法.
Comparative analysis of diagnostic methods for Helicobacter pylori detection in tropical regions
Objective This study focuses on the tropical regions of China(Haikou and Guangzhou)to evaluate the efficacy of the Carbon-14 Urea Breath Test(14C-UBT)and the Rapid Urease Test(RUT)in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)infection.Methods From June to August 2023,we recruited 300 patients complaining of upper abdominal discomfort at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University and the Southern Theater General Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army.Each patient underwent both the 14C-UBT and RUT.We recorded and analyzed the positive rates of H.pylori infection detected by both methods and the statistical differences between them.Results The results showed that the positive rates for 14C-UBT were 32.67%and 31.33%,respectively,while for RUT they were 30.00%and 26.00%.Although there were differences in the positive rates between the two methods,these differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05).However,in terms of sensitivity,14C-UBT performed significantly better than RUT(P<0.05).Conclusion The diagnosis of H.pylori infection should adopt different detection methods according to the actual situation.

14C-UBTRUTHelicobacter pyloriClinical application value

吕燕婷、杨澜、陈世锔、王扬、白飞虎

展开 >

570100 海南医学院第二附属医院消化内科

510000 中国人民解放军南部战区总医院消化内科

570100 海南医学院第二附属医院消化内镜科

14 C-UBT RUT 幽门螺杆菌 临床应用价值

2024

现代消化及介入诊疗
广东省医学学术交流中心

现代消化及介入诊疗

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.019
ISSN:1672-2159
年,卷(期):2024.29(9)