首页|不同眼底视网膜筛查方式对ROP检出及不良反应的对比分析

不同眼底视网膜筛查方式对ROP检出及不良反应的对比分析

Comparison of different screening methods for ROP detection and their impact on adverse reactions

扫码查看
目的 对比分析不同筛查方式对早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)检出及不良反应发生情况.方法 选取2023年1月至2024年2月在医院产科出生的早产儿为研究对象,均行,根据筛查方法,选择双目间接检眼镜(BIO)组400例(800眼)、广域视网膜数字照相(Retcam Ⅲ)组400例(800眼)及RetcamⅢ联合巩膜压迫法组400例(800眼).比较三组检出ROP的分期及检查过程中患儿不良反应发生情况.结果 不同筛查方法ROP分期结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).三组筛查方式不良反应发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且Retcam川组、Retcam Ⅲ联合巩膜压迫法组不良反应发生率均低于BIO组.结论 RetcamⅢ及Retcam Ⅲ联合巩膜压迫法对ROP检出与BI0具有较高的一致性,且不良反应发生率较小.
Objective To explore the influence of different methods of screening on the detection of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP)and the analysis of related factors on adverse reactions.Methods A total of 1200 premature infants born in the obstetrics department of our hospital from January 2023 to February 2024 were selected for fundus retinal screening.According to the screening method,400 patients(800 eyes),400 patients(800 eyes)in RetcamⅢ group and 400 patients(800 eyes)in RetcamⅢ combined scleral compression group were compared with the stages of ROP in the three groups,and recorded the occurrence of adverse reactions in the children during the examination.Results Comparison of ROP stage results between different screening methods(P>0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions among the three screening groups was statistically different(P<0.05),and the incidence of adverse reactions in the RetcamⅢ group and RetcamⅢ and scleral compression group was lower than that in the BIO group.Conclusion The combination of RetcamⅢ and RetcamⅢ and scleral compression showed high consistency between ROP detection and BIO,and the incidence of adverse reactions was small.

Binocular indirect ophthalmoscopeRetcam ⅢScleral compression methodRetinopathy of premature infants

杨娟、李强、朱伽月

展开 >

510800 广东省广州市花都区人民医院

双目间接检眼镜 Retcam 巩膜压迫法 早产儿视网膜病变

2024

现代养生
河北省医疗气功医院

现代养生

影响因子:1.355
ISSN:1671-0223
年,卷(期):2024.24(23)